Using Data to Achieve Surgical Health Equity in the Community

Overview

The goal of this retrospective cohort and pragmatic pilot trial is to examine the social determinants of health in racial and ethnic minority patients from socially vulnerable backgrounds who have Gallbladder Disease (GBD). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What racial barriers in outcome exist for socially vulnerable patients with gallbladder disease? 2. How effective is telemedicine consultation in improving surgical outcomes for socially vulnerable patients with gallbladder disease? Study participants will be asked to undergo telemedicine consultation in place of regular consultation with their doctor before undergoing treatment. Researchers will compare the telemedicine consultation groups with traditional care patients to see if telemedicine consultation is effective at reducing surgical disparity outcomes.

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: June 30, 2024

Detailed Description

This study seeks to identify differences in the care paradigms to find and test solutions to racial disparities in emergent cholecystectomy, as well as develop and test a pilot study to compare the effectiveness of telemedicine consultation. To address surgical health equity in patients with gallbladder disease, this study aims to: 1. Examine racial disparities in outcomes of Primary Care Service Line (PCSL) patients with symptomatic GB disease with attention to conditional effects of social vulnerabilities (SV) 2. Compare the effectiveness study of telemedicine consultation for symptomatic GB disease in patients with social vulnerabilities This study will be divided into two phases to address each aim. The first aim will be conducted as a retrospective cohort study and examine the outcomes of PCSL patients diagnosed with symptomatic GB disease between Jan. 1, 2020 and Sept. 30, 2022 using PennMedicine data to build regression models with interaction terms to examine racial disparities in surgical consultation and the conditional effects of SV factors on this relationship. The second aim will be performed as a pragmatic pilot trial of Penn PCSL patients with SV. For this aim, the investigators will pragmatically assign two groups to traditional care and telemedicine consultation and study the resultant outcomes from patients with diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis or biliary colic as seen by a PCSL provider between April 1, and June 30, 2023. These results will provide data to develop evidence-based solutions to racial disparities within Penn Medicine and to serve as preliminary data for subsequent studies to promote health equity in patients with symptomatic GBD.

Interventions

  • Behavioral: Telemedicine Consultation
    • Patients will be contacted by their surgeon over the phone to discuss surgical treatment.
  • Behavioral: Traditional Care
    • Patients will proceed with their surgical consultation as per standard practice.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Telemedicine Consultation
    • Patient will schedule a Telemedicine Consultation in place of traditional in-person visit.
  • Active Comparator: Traditional In-Person Care
    • Patient will schedule a traditional in-person visit as per usual care.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Cholecystectomy Surgical Outcome
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Compare rates of surgical consultation by consultation type.

Secondary Measures

  • Time from Referral to Consultation
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Number of days between initial documentation of referral to surgery by provider and initial pre-operative consultation with surgeon by consultation type. Identified by EMR documentation and encounter visits.
  • Completion of Consultation
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Completion of initial pre-operative consultation visit with surgeon for patients referred to surgery. Identified by EMR documentation and encounter visits.
  • Effect of Consultation on Surgical Outcome.
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Operative treatment outcomes received by patients who received pre-operative consultation with the surgeon. Operative treatment will be determined using CPT and ICD-10-PCS codes for cholecystectomy as listed in HPM (CPT 47562, CPT 47563, CPT 47600, CPT 47605, CPT 56340, CPT 56341, ICD10 0FB40ZX, ICD10 OFB40ZZ, ICD10 OFT40ZZ).
  • Urgency of Operative Treatment
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Urgency for operative treatment for whether cholecystectomy was performed in the emergent or elective setting as determined by admission source for the associated operative encounter and CPT and ICD-10-PCS codes for cholecystectomy as listed in HPM (CPT 47562, CPT 47563, CPT 47600, CPT 47605, CPT 56340, CPT 56341, ICD10 0FB40ZX, ICD10 OFB40ZZ, ICD10 OFT40ZZ).
  • Cost
    • Time Frame: 6 Months
    • Cost of care including preoperative consultation visit with the surgeon and cholecystectomy visit. Data will be obtained from Horizon Performance Manager.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients age > 18 in the Primary Care Service Line (PCSL) and Emergency Department (ED) discharges including referral to surgery – Member of a racial or ethnic minority, not primary English speaking, from a low-income neighborhood, or underinsured – With a new ICD-10 code for symptomatic cholelithiasis or biliary colic seen by a PCSL provider or discharge from an ED between February 1, and June 30, 2023 Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior cholecystectomy – Prisoner – GB cancer – Advanced cirrhosis – Untreated coagulopathy – No indication for surgery – Unable/unwilling to provide consent

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • University of Pennsylvania
  • Collaborator
    • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Rachel Kelz, MD, Principal Investigator, University of Pennsylvania
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Emna Bakillah, MD, 267-624-3566, Emna.bakillah@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

References

Cox, M.R., G.D. Eslick, and R. Padbury, The management of gallstone disease: a practical and evidence-based approach. 2018: Springer.

Altieri MS, Yang J, Zhu C, Sbayi S, Spaniolas K, Talamini M, Pryor A. What happens to biliary colic patients in New York State? 10-year follow-up from emergency department visits. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):2058-2066. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5902-5. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

Prevention, C.f.D.C.a. Adult Obesity Facts. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 2022 May 17, 2022 [cited 2022 September 19, 2022]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html#:~:text=Obesityaffectssomegroupsmorethanothers&text=NonHispanicBlackadults(49.9,HispanicAsianadults(16.1).Accessed09/18/2022.

Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2368-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. Epub 2010 Aug 13. No abstract available.

Radunovic M, Lazovic R, Popovic N, Magdelinic M, Bulajic M, Radunovic L, Vukovic M, Radunovic M. Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Our Experience from a Retrospective Analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016 Dec 15;4(4):641-646. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.128. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Jan;84(1):20-2.

Sobolev B, Mercer D, Brown P, FitzGerald M, Jalink D, Shaw R. Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):662-5.

To KB, Cherry-Bukowiec JR, Englesbe MJ, Terjimanian MN, Shijie C, Campbell DA Jr, Napolitano LM. Emergent versus elective cholecystectomy: conversion rates and outcomes. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Dec;14(6):512-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.160. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

Rutledge D, Jones D, Rege R. Consequences of delay in surgical treatment of biliary disease. Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):466-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00520-1.

Munoz E, Tinker MA, Margolis I, Wise L. Surgonomics: the cost of cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1984 Oct;96(4):642-7.

Carmichael H, Moore A, Steward L, Velopulos CG. Using the Social Vulnerability Index to Examine Local Disparities in Emergent and Elective Cholecystectomy. J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Lin JA, Braun HJ, Schwab ME, Pierce L, Sosa JA, Wick EC. Pandemic Recovery: Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Surgical Procedures. Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004848. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Shenoy R, Kirkland P, Maggard-Gibbons M, Russell MM. Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: Do Minority Patients Experience Delays to Surgery? J Surg Res. 2022 Apr;272:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Janeway MG, Sanchez SE, Rosen AK, Patts G, Allee LC, Lasser KE, Dechert TA. Disparities in Utilization of Ambulatory Cholecystectomy: Results From Three States. J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.052. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Saluja S, Hochman M, Dokko R, Morrison JL, Valdez C, Baldwin S, Tandel MD, Cousineau M. Community-Based Health Care Navigation's Impact on Access to Primary Care for Low-Income Latinos. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):44-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210253.

Han HR, Lee H, Kim MT, Kim KB. Tailored lay health worker intervention improves breast cancer screening outcomes in non-adherent Korean-American women. Health Educ Res. 2009 Apr;24(2):318-29. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn021. Epub 2008 May 7.

Chavarri-Guerra Y, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Ramos-Lopez W, San Miguel de Majors SL, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Ahumada-Tamayo S, Viramontes-Aguilar L, Sanchez-Gutierrez O, Davila-Davila B, Rojo-Castillo P, Perez-Montessoro V, Bukowski A, Goss PE. Patient Navigation to Enhance Access to Care for Underserved Patients with a Suspicion or Diagnosis of Cancer. Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):1195-1200. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0133. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

Berkowitz RL, Phillip N, Berry L, Yen IH. Patient Experiences in a Linguistically Diverse Safety Net Primary Care Setting: Qualitative Study. J Particip Med. 2018 Jan 22;10(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jopm.9229.

Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, Wiseman JT, Clarkson S, Bennett K, Greenberg CC, Kent KC. Current Use of Telemedicine for Post-Discharge Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):915-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.062. Epub 2016 Feb 13. No abstract available.

Sathiyakumar V, Apfeld JC, Obremskey WT, Thakore RV, Sethi MK. Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: a pilot study. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):e139-45. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000189.

Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth. 2018 May 2;4:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.03. eCollection 2018.

Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.

Abbitt D, Choy K, Castle R, Carmichael H, Jones TS, Wikiel KJ, Barnett CC, Moore JT, Robinson TN, Jones EL. Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans. Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3201-3207. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09501-6. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

Dekker PK, Bhardwaj P, Singh T, Bekeny JC, Kim KG, Steinberg JS, Evans KK, Song DH, Attinger CE, Fan KL. Telemedicine in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Increasing Access to Surgical Care. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 15;9(1):e3228. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003228. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Eruchalu CN, Bergmark RW, Smink DS, Tavakkoli A, Nguyen LL, Bates DW, Cooper Z, Ortega G. Demographic Disparity in Use of Telemedicine for Ambulatory General Surgical Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Initial Public Health Emergency and Second Phase Periods. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Feb 1;234(2):191-202. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000030.

Maurer KR, Everhart JE, Ezzati TM, Johannes RS, Knowler WC, Larson DL, Sanders R, Shawker TH, Roth HP. Prevalence of gallstone disease in Hispanic populations in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1989 Feb;96(2 Pt 1):487-92. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91575-8. Erratum In: Gastroenterology 1989 Jun;96(6):1630.

Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):981-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004.

Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.

Kaufman EJ, Keele LJ, Wirtalla CJ, Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Mavroudis CL, Reilly PM, Holena DN, McHugh MD, Small D, Kelz RR. Operative and Nonoperative Outcomes of Emergency General Surgery Conditions: An Observational Study Using a Novel Instrumental Variable. Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):72-78. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005519. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):216-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820229.

Schmidt M, Sondenaa K, Dumot JA, Rosenblatt S, Hausken T, Ramnefjell M, Njolstad G, Eide GE. Post-cholecystectomy symptoms were caused by persistence of a functional gastrointestinal disorder. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 28;18(12):1365-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i12.1365.

Bell ML, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146397. eCollection 2018.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.