The Inner Garden and Care for Children With Moderate to Severe Agitation

Overview

The objective is to compare the care including the solution of ambient sensory biofeedback "Inner Garden", compared to the care without this solution, on the regulation of behavioral disorders during a crisis requiring to take the child out of group care. The nursing support with the "Inner Garden" tool in three care units will be compared with the practice in six other units not equipped with this tool.

Full Title of Study: “Pilot Study on the Care for Children With Moderate to Severe Agitation, With or Without the Use of a Semi-supervised Support Solution”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Non-Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Other
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: July 6, 2021

Detailed Description

Psychiatric illnesses affect more than one person in five each year. In France, the majority of disorders among minors under the care of child psychiatry in full or part-time hospitalization are disorders of psychological development (32%) and behavioural and emotional disorders (24.6%). Hospitalisation is reserved for the most complex acute crisis situations, as well as for children who need to be cared for by a multidisciplinary team several times a week to support their psychological development. In our study, the investigators focus on one of the clinical manifestations regularly present: the state of agitation when its intensity is moderate to severe. "The state of agitation is defined as a psychic, motor and relational behavioural disorder that leads to a reaction of intolerance on the part of people in the entourage". The care teams will then implement care actions that will be a graduated response adapted to the intensity of these states of agitation. In addition to the support provided by a caregiver, the investigators propose to use the "Inner Garden" system developed in 2014 at the laboratory of National Institute for Research in Digital Science and Technology in Bordeaux. It is an interactive Zen garden allowing to present feedback (topographical, physiological) under different sensory modalities.

Interventions

  • Device: Inner Garden
    • Care actions adapted to the intensity of the states of agitation (The child can be removed from the group while remaining in the same room on a chair with a caregiver. If the problems are too serious, the child can be accompanied to a “soothing” room where the carer will take care of him/her individually. In units equipped with Inner Garden, the child can use it under semi- supervision of nurses.)

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • No Intervention: Control
    • Wards without the “Inner Garden” biofeedback tool
  • Experimental: Inner Garden
    • Wards with the “Inner Garden” biofeedback tool

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Number of crises
    • Time Frame: 8 months after inclusion
    • Agitation crises of moderate to severe intensity, which did not allow the child to reintegrate the group of care during the sessions

Secondary Measures

  • Score at the Emotion Regulation Checklist
    • Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
    • This questionnaire measures the perception of adults close to children about their ability to regulate their emotions in everyday life. It proposes 24 behavioural statements that refer to emotional responses and reactions of joy, anger, empathy with peers and adults, frustration, and activity transitions. For each statement, the adult rates the frequency of the behaviour on a 4-point Likert scale: “never”, “sometimes”, “often”, “almost always”.
  • Score at the Emotion Regulation Checklist
    • Time Frame: 8 months after inclusion
    • This questionnaire measures the perception of adults close to children about their ability to regulate their emotions in everyday life. It proposes 24 behavioural statements that refer to emotional responses and reactions of joy, anger, empathy with peers and adults, frustration, and activity transitions. For each statement, the adult rates the frequency of the behaviour on a 4-point Likert scale: “never”, “sometimes”, “often”, “almost always”.
  • Number of adverse events related to aggression/violence during group care sessions
    • Time Frame: 9 months after inclusion
    • Assault or violence against health professional with a statement in the dedicated application

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Taken care in Children's Hospitalization Unit of Child Psychiatry Department, – Parent affiliated or beneficiary of social security, – Information to the child and the legal representative(s) and signed consent by the legal representative(s). Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate on the part of the child and/or legal representative(s).

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 3 Years

Maximum Age: 12 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
  • Collaborator
    • Ullo World
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Nordine Benmabrouk, RN, Study Director, Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
    • Brigitte Laurent, PhD, Study Director, Ullo World

References

Domon-Archambault V, Terradas MM, Drieu D, De Fleurian A, Achim J, Poulain S, Jerrar-Oulidi J. Mentalization-Based Training Program for Child Care Workers in Residential Settings. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Jun 21;13(2):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00269-x. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Niquille M, Gremion C, Welker S, Damsa C. [Agitation in prehospital setting: view of emergency physicians]. Rev Med Suisse. 2007 Aug 15;3(121):1839-46. French.

Tereno S, Soares I, Martins C, Celani M, Sampaio D. Attachment styles, memories of parental rearing and therapeutic bond: a study with eating disordered patients, their parents and therapists. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2008 Jan;16(1):49-58. doi: 10.1002/erv.801.

Lewis GF, Hourani L, Tueller S, Kizakevich P, Bryant S, Weimer B, Strange L. Relaxation training assisted by heart rate variability biofeedback: Implication for a military predeployment stress inoculation protocol. Psychophysiology. 2015 Sep;52(9):1167-74. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12455. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

Zeman J, Shipman K, Suveg C. Anger and sadness regulation: predictions to internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):393-8. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3103_11.

Chicchi Giglioli IA, Pallavicini F, Pedroli E, Serino S, Riva G. Augmented Reality: A Brand New Challenge for the Assessment and Treatment of Psychological Disorders. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:862942. doi: 10.1155/2015/862942. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

Baus O, Bouchard S. Moving from virtual reality exposure-based therapy to augmented reality exposure-based therapy: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 4;8:112. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00112. eCollection 2014.

Gold G, Fazio L, Stolz JH, Herrman FR, Gattelet P, Zekry D. [Assessment of behavior in non-psychiatric settings: use of a simple and reliable method]. Rev Med Suisse. 2012 Nov 7;8(361):2119-21. French.

Kay SR, Wolkenfeld F, Murrill LM. Profiles of aggression among psychiatric patients. I. Nature and prevalence. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Sep;176(9):539-46. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198809000-00007.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.