Cost-utility and Physiological Effects of ACT and BATD in Patients With Chronic Pain and Depression

Overview

Objectives: (1) To analyze the effectiveness of adding a group-based form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or a behavioural activation program for depression (TACD) to the treatment as usual (TAU) for patients diagnosed of chronic pain and comorbid mild-moderate major depression; (2) To examine the cost-utility of these psychological treatments from healthcare and societal perspectives; (3) To measure a set of biomarkers alongside the RCT in order to know the physiological underpinnings of these psychological therapies and to identify potential predictors of treatment response. Methodology: 12-month multisite, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) Centres: Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (St. Boi de Llobregat) and Hospital del Mar (Barcelona). Participants. 225 adult patients with chronic pain that meet the diagnostic criteria for mild-moderate major depression will be randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: TAU + ACT vs. TAU + TACD vs. TAU. Primary outcome: Quality of life. Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, depression severity, anxiety symptoms, pain catastrophising, and pain acceptance. Costs to the healthcare system and to society and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). In addition, the empirically validated app Multicenter Pain Monitor® will be used to monitor participants alongside the treatments (ecological momentary assessment). Biomarkers: hair cortisol and cortisone, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), ACTH and cortisol in plasma, and genotyping of 5 polymorphisms in the FKBP5 gene involved in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, cytokines, Th1: IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α; cytokines Th2: IL-10 + hsCRP test, and vitamin D levels. Main statistical analyses: Intention-to-Treat analyses that will include all participants who undergo random allocation, using multiple imputation to replace missing values. Linear mixed-effects models will be performed using Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate the parameters. Calculation of between-groups effect sizes using Cohen's d and of the number-needed-to-treat. Economic evaluation: cost-utility ratios evaluated by applying bootstrapping techniques, acceptability curves, and sensitivity analyses.

Full Title of Study: “Cost-utility and Physiological Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Behavior Activation in Patients With Chronic Pain and Comorbid Major Depression (IMPACT Project)”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: December 31, 2021

Detailed Description

The IMPACT Project's main objective is to determine the effectiveness of adding to the standard care of patients with chronic pain and mild to moderate major depression a group programme based on ACT or a group programme based on BATD and analyse the cost-utility of these psychological treatments from a health and social perspective. Likewise, both in chronic pain and in other usually associated psychiatric diseases, there is a ubiquitous lack of knowledge about what specific psychological and physiological mechanisms are modified by these third generation psychotherapies and how they relate to the observed clinical results. The potential predictors of response to these treatments are also unknown. In chronic musculoskeletal pain where central sensitization plays an important role, alterations have been found in different markers associated with an increased experience of pain. Some of these alterations in markers (e.g. high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines) would also appear to be shared with other psychiatric diseases (major depression), a fact that would suggest a possible common mechanism involved in the etiopathogenesis of these diseases. Third generation psychotherapies have proven effective for pain management and regulation of the immune response. The IMPACT Multicentre Project (Improving Pain and Depression with ACT and BATD) will significantly expand the limited knowledge available about how ACT and BATD therapies exert their effects on relevant clinical improvement variables and will try to identify response predictive factors to these treatments.

Interventions

  • Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
    • Group treatment protocol of 8 weekly 90 minute sessions. Session 1: Presentation of the general concept of ACT therapy. Session 2: Value analysis I. Session 3: Value analysis II. Session 4: Value analysis III. Session 5: Values and feelings. Session 6: Taking a direction. Session 7: Dare and change. Session 8: Ready to act with ACT.
  • Behavioral: Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD)
    • Group treatment protocol of 8 weekly 90 minute sessions. Session 1: Collection of information regarding areas of activity and interaction contexts. Session 2: Identification of information related to depressive behaviours. Session 3 Obtaining complementary information regarding the characteristics of the history of patient interactions and any contexts. Session 4: Explanation of the hypotheses of problematic behaviour, its maintenance and change throughout the intervention. Session 5: Once the 10 target activities have been identified, a record is made to track and their progress weekly. Session 6: Discussion of what was obtained from the records in general and of the satisfaction obtained, and explanation of the contexts and reinforcers. Session 7: Psycho-education Session 8: New behaviours, the goals achieved and the maintenance of the weekly activity are inquired about.
  • Other: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
    • Standard pharmacological treatment usually provided to patients suffering chronic pain and mild-moderate depression.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: TAU + Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
    • This therapy is based, as the name implies, on the acceptance (not avoidance) of negative experiences as a coping strategy, and on committing to life values or objectives. ACT has been used for various conditions, including chronic pain. Since avoidance is a strategy frequently used by patients suffering from pain, the application of this therapy seems very appropriate. In fact, it has been proven that patients who accept their pain more are those who score lower in pain intensity, have less negative emotions and enjoy a better quality of life.
  • Experimental: TAU + Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD)
    • Behavioural and structured treatment based on the application of learning principles. Its objective is to counteract depressive symptoms and, as a consequence, to ensure that patients regain a productive and emotionally satisfying life. Its basic methodology consists in activating subjects with depression through programming and conduct of behaviours that are likely to increase the positive reinforcement of their context.
  • Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
    • Standard Care. Although there is no treatment considered as the gold standard for chronic pain and comorbid major depression, the standard treatment is usually mainly pharmacological and conforms to the symptomatic profile of each patient.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Aggregate score of the Physical Function, Body Pain and Vitality subscales of the SF-36
    • Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    • The range of scores is 15 to 65. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Secondary Measures

  • Numerical pain scale
    • Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    • Patients evaluate their pain in a continuum from 0 to 10, where 0 is absence of pain and 0 is the worst possible pain.
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
    • Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    • Scale of 14 items created to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, and each subscale (HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression) includes 7 items with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity.
  • Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)
    • Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    • Scale of 13 items comprising three dimensions: rumination over pain, magnification of pain and helplessness in the face of pain symptoms. The PCS total score and subscale scores are computed as the sum of ratings for each item. This study used the total score, which can vary from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophising.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who have been visited in the last 3 years in the participating centres and who have been given a diagnosis of chronic non-cancer musculoskeletal pain. In telephone screening, it will be evaluated whether the current pain intensity is at least moderate and PHQ-9 will be administered to confirm the presence of mild to moderate active depression. 1. Patients between 18 and 70 years of age. 2. Diagnosis of chronic pain (≥ 3 months) according to medical history (current pain ≥ 4 out of 10) 3. Diagnosis of mild to moderate depression according to PHQ-9 (score between 5 and 19). 4. Understanding of Spanish. 5. Access to a Smartphone (with Android operating system). 6. Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria:

1. Presence of cognitive impairment according to MMSE (≤ 24 out of 30). 2. Previous (last year) or current psychological treatment. 3. Presence of severe mental disorder (e.g. psychotic disorder) related to substance dependence/abuse or another disease that affects the CNS (organic brain pathology or head trauma of any severity). 4. Presence of serious, uncontrolled or degenerative medical disease that may interfere with affective symptoms. 5. Risk of suicide (Item 9 score of PHQ-9 ≥ 2). 6. Patients involved in legal proceedings with employers in relation to their illness. 7. Patients with scheduled surgical intervention or other interventions. 8. Inability to attend group treatment sessions. Additional exclusion criteria for the study of biomarkers (50% of subjects in each branch): 1. Cold/infection symptoms on the day of blood collection. 2. Needle phobia. 3. BMI > 36 kg/m2 or weight > 110 kg 4. Consumption > 8 units of caffeine per day (maximum 1 drink with caffeine on the day of testing). 5. Smoker > 5 cigarettes a day. 6. Being pregnant or breastfeeding

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 70 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
  • Collaborator
    • Carlos III Health Institute
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Juan Vicente Luciano, Principal Investigator – Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Juan V. Luciano, PhD, Principal Investigator, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu

References

Sanabria-Mazo JP, Forero CG, Cristobal-Narvaez P, Suso-Ribera C, Garcia-Palacios A, Colomer-Carbonell A, Perez-Aranda A, Andres-Rodriguez L, McCracken LM, D'Amico F, Estivill-Rodriguez P, Carreras-Marcos B, Montes-Perez A, Comps-Vicente O, Esteve M, Grasa M, Rosa A, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Maes M, Borras X, Edo S, Sanz A, Feliu-Soler A, Castano-Asins JR, Luciano JV. Efficacy, cost-utility and physiological effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioural Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD) in patients with chronic low back pain and depression: study protocol of a randomised, controlled trial including mobile-technology-based ecological momentary assessment (IMPACT study). BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e038107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038107.

Citations Reporting on Results

Sanabria-Mazo JP, Colomer-Carbonell A, Borras X, Castano-Asins JR, McCracken LM, Montero-Marin J, Perez-Aranda A, Edo S, Sanz A, Feliu-Soler A, Luciano JV. Efficacy of Videoconference Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD) for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Plus Comorbid Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMPACT Study). J Pain. 2023 Aug;24(8):1522-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.