Effects of Various Types of Ultrasound Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis

Overview

This study evaluates the effects of various types of ultrasound therapy: continuous, pulsed, sham ultrasound and ultrasound combined with electrotherapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Beside ultrasound therapy, patients received usual physiotherapy (balneotherapy, exercise and massage) either.

Full Title of Study: “Effects of Various Types of Ultrasound Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis – a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Follow-up Study”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: August 3, 2019

Detailed Description

During ultrasound therapy electrical energy is converted into mechanical energy and heat. It has physical, chemical and biologic effects, like thermal effect, micro-massage, increased tissue metabolism, capillary permeability and tissue healing. Continuous or pulsed forms can be applied. As pulsed ultrasound therapy has no thermal effect, greater intensity can be used. It can alleviate acute pain and inflammation. Continuous ultrasound is usually used in chronic musculoskeletal diseases, in case of limitation of joint motion because its thermal effect. Ultrasound can be combined with electrotherapy, when the effects of the two modalities are summed up.

Interventions

  • Device: Continuous ultrasound therapy
    • continuous US therapy once a day, 9 minutes/session for two weeks (10 occasions) with BTL-4825S Premium device, 5 cm2 probe, 3 MHz frequency, 1,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity
  • Device: pulsed ultrasound therapy
    • pulsed US therapy once a day, 9 minutes/session, for two weeks (10 occasions) with BTL-4825S Premium device, 5 cm2 probe, 3 MHz frequency, 1,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity, 50% duty cycle
  • Device: US and electrotherapy (sonotens)
    • US and electrotherapy (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) once a day, 10 minutes /session, for two weeks (10 occasions) with BTL-4825S Premium device, 5 cm2 probe, US: 3 MHz frequency, 0,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity, TENS: application in conventional mode at 100 Hz frequency and 100 μs wavelength
  • Device: Sham ultrasound therapy
    • sham US therapy once a day for two weeks (10 occasions) with BTL-4825S Premium device, 5 cm2 probe, 0 MHz frequency, 0 W/cm2 SATA intensity

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: Usual physiotherapy and continuous ultrasound therapy
    • Patients received usual physiotherapy (exercise, massage, balneotherapy) and continuous ultrasound therapy (BTL-4825S Premium device, head size of 5 cm2, 3 MHz frequency, 1,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity) every working day for two weeks (10 occasions).
  • Active Comparator: Usual physiotherapy and pulsed ultrasound therapy
    • Patients received usual physiotherapy (exercise, massage, balneotherapy) and pulsed ultrasound therapy (BTL-4825S Premium device, head size of 5 cm2, 3 MHz frequency, 1,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity, 50% duty cycle) every working day for two weeks (10 occasions).
  • Active Comparator: Usual physiotherapy and sonotens therapy
    • Patients received usual physiotherapy (exercise, massage, balneotherapy) and sonotens therapy (BTL-4825S Premium device, head size of 5 cm2, 3 MHz frequency, 0,5 W/cm2 SATA intensity, transcutanous electrical nerve stimulation) every working day for two weeks (10 occasions).
  • Placebo Comparator: Usual physiotherapy and sham ultrasound therapy
    • Patients received usual physiotherapy (exercise, massage, balneotherapy) and sham ultrasound therapy (BTL-4825S Premium device, head size of 5 cm2, 0 MHz frequency, 0 W/cm2 SATA intensity) every working day for two weeks (10 occasions).

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • change in severity of pain at rest
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 2
    • change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
  • change in severity of pain at rest
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 12
    • change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
  • change in function
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 2
    • change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 2. It is comprised of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). All the items are scored on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Values are summed up for a combined WOMAC score. The lower score represents better outcome.
  • change in function
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 12
    • change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 12. It is comprised of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). All the items are scored on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Values are summed up for a combined WOMAC score. The lower score represents better outcome.
  • change in function
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 2
    • change from baseline physical function measured by the 6-minute walking test. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. Patients can walk at a self chosen walking speed, can have a rest or can use a walking aid. The accomplished distance is the total distance at the end of the 6 minutes.
  • change in function
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 12
    • change from baseline physical function measured by the 6-minute walking test at Week 12. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. Patients can walk at a self chosen walking speed, can have a rest or can use a walking aid. The accomplished distance is the total distance at the end of the 6 minutes.
  • change in quality of life
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 2
    • change from baseline quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey /SF-36/) at week 2. It consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health), which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more the disability, i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability.
  • change in quality of life
    • Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 12
    • change from baseline quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey /SF-36/) at week 12. It consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health), which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more the disability, i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients over 18 years of age with moderate hip osteoarthritis (radiologically Kellgren- Laurence II-III. stage) – chronic hip pain (for at least 8 weeks) – pain intensity is ≥ 50mm on a Visual Analogue Scale – no physiotherapy or local injection (steroid, hialuronic acid) within 3 months before starting the study Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute hip pain (duration is less than 8 weeks) – steroid, hialuronic acid injection into the hip joint within 3 months – physiotherapy of the hip within 3 months – inflammatory hip osteoarthritis – infection – fever – tumour – epilepsy – pregnancy – untreated hypertension – heart failure (NYHA II-IV. stage) – inflammatory rheumatic diseases – hip arthroplasty – pacemaker or intracardiac device – severe osteoporosis – osteomyelitis

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Márta Király, chief physician – Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Márta Király, Principal Investigator, Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.