Post Market Multi-Center Retrospective Research on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms With Pipeline Embolization Device in China

Overview

Pipeline TM embolization device launched to China in 2014, and has been widely used to treat large width IA. Therefore, it is necessary to collect and analysis the clinical data to evaluate effectiveness and safety of its usage in Chinese population, and this may guide the clinical practice and meet the clinical needs better.

Full Title of Study: “Post Market Multi-Center Retrospective Research on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms With Pipeline Embolization Device in China (PLUS)”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Retrospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: June 30, 2019

Detailed Description

Recent years, the rapid development of endovascular treatment, especially the introduction of blood flow diverter device, has led to a new step in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It is different from usual treatment concept, blood flow diverter device's innovation is guiding to its parent artery reconstruction by cutting into the blood flow velocity and flow rate to the IA, and, promote the forming of aneurysm cavity thrombosis and the Neointima growth of IA's neck, so that to achieve aneurysm treatment. A number of multi-center clinical studies on Pipeline embolization devices (PED, Ev3 Company/Medtronic, USA) have been conducted in North America and Europe recently. Becske etc reported the result of one multi-center prospective clinical trial of North America (PUFS), the PED treats the complicated intracranial internal carotid artery aneurysm. At the time of 180 days, 1 year, 3 years follow-up, the complete occlusion rate were 73.6%, 86.8% and 93.4% respectively. O 'kelly etc. the study showed that the rate of subtotal occlusion over 1 year follow-up of PED treatment for complex intracranial aneurysms was 90%. Many studies have confirmed the effectiveness of PED in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. The main motivation to innovate the blood flow diverter device is to use it to treat some large or giant aneurysms, fusiform aneurysm which can't be treated well by ordinary interventional embolization methods. So, in the initial stage of the application, its indications are mainly focus on the large or giant aneurysms located in the internal carotid artery before the origin of the posterior communicating artery. In recent years, the blood flow diverter devices were already used to treat many kinds of IA in almost all parts of the brain, different sizes and with pathological changes, such as dissecting aneurysms and vesicular aneurysms. Although there was already much clinical research evidence which proved the efficacy and safety of PipelineTM 's treatment to the aneurysm as the embolization device, but these data are all from the foreign population, there is still no published clinical evidence of large sample size clinical study of Chinese population. Pipeline has been widely used to treat large width IA. Therefore, it's meaningful to evaluate effectiveness and safety in Chinese population, and this may guide the clinical practice and meet the clinical needs better.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Rate of complete aneurysm occlusion in 12 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 12 months (plus or minus 3 months) after procedure
    • Complete occlusion defined as no contrast in contact with the IA neck or with the wall of the IA sac
  • Occurrence of ipsilateral major stroke or neurovascular death in 12 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 12 months (plus or minus 3 months) after procedure
    • Including but not limited: Spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm, Ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage, Ischemic stroke, Symptomatic parent artery stenosis, Permanent cranial neuropathy

Secondary Measures

  • Rate of Complete aneurysm occlusion in 6 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 6 months (plus or minus 3 months) after procedure
    • Complete occlusion defined as no contrast in contact with the IA neck or with the wall of the IA sac
  • Rate of Complete aneurysm occlusion in 24 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 24 months (plus or minus 6 months) after procedure
    • Complete occlusion defined as no contrast in contact with the IA neck or with the wall of the IA sac
  • Occurrence of ipsilateral major stroke or neurovascular death in 1 month
    • Time Frame: assessed at 1 month (plus or minus 0.5 month) after procedure
    • Including but not limited: Spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm, Ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage, Ischemic stroke, Symptomatic parent artery stenosis, Permanent cranial neuropathy
  • Device-related neurologic adverse event in 12 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 12 months (plus or minus 3 months) after procedure
    • Including but not limited: Spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm, Ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage, Ischemic stroke, Symptomatic parent artery stenosis, Permanent cranial neuropathy
  • Occurrence of ipsilateral major stroke or neurovascular death in 24 months
    • Time Frame: assessed at 24 months (plus or minus 6 months) after procedure
    • Including but not limited: Spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm, Ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage, Ischemic stroke, Symptomatic parent artery stenosis, Permanent cranial neuropathy

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients accepting to participate the study – Patients treated with Pipeline Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated by parent vessel occlusion – Patients treated by other stent – Patients lacking 3-dimensional aneurysm images or the images not satisfied the simulation

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Beijing Neurosurgical Institute
  • Collaborator
    • Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Xinjian Yang, MD, Vice Chair of Department of Interventional Neuroradiology – Beijing Neurosurgical Institute
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Xinjian Yang, MD, Principal Investigator, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Xinjian Yang, MD, +86-010-59978852, yang-xj@163.net

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.