Crestal Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction of Screw Retained Restoration

Overview

On of the main fixed prosthetic options of completely edentulous patients is the screw-retained implant supported prosthesis which was constructed on transmucosal abutments with its encountered problems such as: hardness to make it passively seated with multiple screw fracture and loosening problems and multiple encountered veneer material fracture and so there effect on patient satisfaction with multiple maintenance recalls.so, we want to try a new technique of fabrication which was proposed for reducing the problems of lack of passivity which is the intraoral luting cement technique on titanium bases with reduced screw number but, with luting cement problems as de-cementation and cement biological effects on soft tissues and bone and there effect on number of patient recall visits and maintenance and so there effect on patient satisfaction.

Full Title of Study: “Crestal Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction of Screw Retained Restoration Using Multi-unit Abutments Versus Intra-oral Luting on Titanium Bases in Implant Supported Complete Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: September 1, 2019

Interventions

  • Other: titanium bases using intra oral luting cement technique
    • comparing between screw retained prosthesis constructed on transmucosal abutments versus titanium bases in terms of crestal bone loss and patient satisfaction

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: Screw retained prosthesis on transmucosal abutments
  • Experimental: Screw retained prosthesis on titanium bases

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Crestal bone loss
    • Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
    • measuring crestal bone loss around implants using periapical x ray with parallel technique in millemeters

Secondary Measures

  • Patients satisfaction
    • Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
    • Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [11-point ordinal scale from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied)]

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Completely edentulous patients – Patients with completely edentulous ridges have an opposing natural dentition or implant supported overdenture – Completely edentulous patients (with the above mentioned criteria) who have proper amount of attached gingiva (≥2 mm) or to be created – Completely edentulous patients (with the above mentioned criteria) who have no history of bruxism – Completely edentulous patients (with the above mentioned criteria) who were free or controlled diabetic assessed by measuring glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). (lesser than or equal to 6.4 percent ) Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having a medical condition that absolutely contraindicates implant placement. – Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, assessed by measuring glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). (greater than to 6.4 percent ) – Potentially uncooperative patients who are not willing to go through the proposed interventions. – Moderate-to-heavy daily smokers* (who report consuming at least 11 cigarettes/day). – Patients who are having complete lower denture – Patients who have history of bruxism

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Cairo University
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Mohamed saber mohamed ahmed, Assistant lecturer – South Valley University
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Mohamed Saber Ahmed, 00201068316376, mohamed.saber@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.