Optimisation of Falls Prevention After Low-energy Osteoporotic Fractures: Feasibility Study

Overview

Within the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph (GHPSJ), a reinforced medical care of osteoporosis ('Fracture Liaison service') was organized for osteoporotic fractured patients. The evaluation of benefits of this program through a randomized study showed an improvement in diagnostic tests performed (bone densitometry) and antiosteoporotic treatment initiated (OPTIPOST study, being published in BMJ). However, of 323 patients included, 91 presented a new fracture within 12 months. Among them, 40/126 patients (31.7%) were in the reinforced medical care arm. This result clearly demonstrates the need for a specific medical care program for patients with osteoporotic fracture falling regularly.

Full Title of Study: “Optimisation of Falls Prevention After Low-energy Osteoporotic Fractures: Feasibility Study Based on a Rheumatology-rehabilitation Collaboration”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: N/A
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Prevention
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: November 27, 2019

Detailed Description

Only few studies for secondary prevention of falls have been conducted in France yet. This can be partly explained by the complexity of reeducation programs to implement and by organization issues. Moreover, to our knowledge, no study has demonstrated the benefit of such programs on secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, even though falls prevention is needed. Our objective is to demonstrate with a pilot study the feasibility of a falls secondary prevention program, based on a rheumatology (GHPSJ) and reeducation wards (Hôpital Sainte-Marie Paris : HSMP) collaboration. Considering the innovative nature of both this program and this collaboration, a feasibility study is preferable before conducting a larger multicentric study, evaluating locomoter benefits of this program in comparison with usual primary care.

Interventions

  • Other: rehabilitation program
    • Availibility of patients to complete a rehabilitation program during 8 weeks and to come back 4 times for a careful medical examination

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: rehabilitation program
    • Duration of 8 weeks for a cycle of rehabilitation at the rate of two half-days per week Two interventions per half-day: 30 minutes of education and 1h30 of rehabilitation: physiotherapist, psychomotricity, adapted physical activity

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Compliance and satisfaction of patients with reinforced medical care
    • Time Frame: 2 months
    • compliance and satisfaction of patients with reinforced medical care: compliance questionnaire. Evaluation made for the end of the program of reeducation : EVALUATION OF PATIENT ATTENDANCE (2 questions): How many days did you participate in re-education sessions at the Hôpital Sainte-Marie Paris as part of the OPTICHUTE rehabilitation program? Have you attended all the proposed rehabilitation sessions? (yes/no) EVALUATION OF PATIENT SATISFACTION: possible answer: degree of satisfaction (very satisfied/overall Satisfied/overall dissatisfied/ very dissatisfied) A: concerning the initial medical examination and the organization of your appointments : 2 questions B: concerning the progress of the reeducation sessions: 5 questions C: concerning the rehabilitation program more generally: 5 questions D: overall assessment – free comment
  • Satisfaction of health professionals with reinforced medical care: questionnaire.
    • Time Frame: 2 months
    • Satisfaction of health professionals with reinforced medical care: satisfaction questionnaire. Evaluation made for the end of the program of reeducation Sections A and B and D: Hôpital Sainte-Marie Paris staff, Sections C and D: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph staff 12 questions for the sections A-B-C-D with possible answer: degree of satisfaction (very satisfied/rather satisfied/ rather unhappy/ very dissatisfied) A. Regarding the rehabilitation program B. Regarding patients C. Regarding the inclusion visit D: Concerning the link between the rheumatology department of the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph and the hospital day of Rehabilitation of the Hôpital Sainte-Marie Paris E: Overall assessment: ree comment

Secondary Measures

  • Number of news falls
    • Time Frame: 1 year
    • Number of new falls within the year following the beginning of the program
  • Number of new osteoporotic fractures
    • Time Frame: 1 year
    • Number of new osteoporotic fractures within the year following the beginning of the program
  • Number of new hospitalizations
    • Time Frame: 1 year
    • Number of new hospitalizations within the year following the beginning of the program

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men and women (age ≥ 60 years) – Francophone – Hospitalized patient or who is consulted in rheumatology or indicated for bone densitometry in Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, who are suffered a low-energy osteoporotic fracture in the last 12 months – Patient with an acceptable handicap level definied by a Timed Up & Go test (TUG) <14 seconds – Autonomous patient with instrumental activities of daily living score (4 items) = 0/4 and Activities of Daily Living score (6 items) ≥5.5/6 – Patient with medical insurance Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of locomor specialized care for the falls prevention – Cognitive impairment/diagnosed dementia or chronic neurological disorder, which doesn't permit the undertanding or a follow-up to a rehabilitation program – Fall due to a neurovascular disease or acute cardiovascular – Significant comorbidities which don't permit a locomotor rehabilitation care – Refusal to participate in the study – Refusal to follow the entire rehabilitation program – Geographic remoteness which doesn't permit the movement to the rehabilitation center – Contreindicated balneotherapy: incontinence, skin disease or cardiovascular disease – Patient under guardianship or curatorship – Patient deprived of liberty

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 60 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
  • Collaborator
    • Hôpital Sainte-Marie Paris
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Agnès PORTIER, MD, Principal Investigator, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Citations Reporting on Results

McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C. The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2003 Dec;14(12):1028-34. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1507-z. Epub 2003 Nov 5.

Briot K, Cortet B, Thomas T, Audran M, Blain H, Breuil V, Chapuis L, Chapurlat R, Fardellone P, Feron JM, Gauvain JB, Guggenbuhl P, Kolta S, Lespessailles E, Letombe B, Marcelli C, Orcel P, Seret P, Tremollieres F, Roux C. 2012 update of French guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012 May;79(3):304-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF. Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. J Gerontol. 1989 Jul;44(4):M112-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.4.m112.

Karlsson MK, Magnusson H, von Schewelov T, Rosengren BE. Prevention of falls in the elderly–a review. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Mar;24(3):747-62. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2256-7. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Briot K. Fracture Liaison Services. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;29(4):416-421. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000401.

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.

KATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW, JACKSON BA, JAFFE MW. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. No abstract available.

Byles JE, Leigh L, Vo K, Forder P, Curryer C. Life space and mental health: a study of older community-dwelling persons in Australia. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(2):98-106. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.917607. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

Ibrahim A, Singh DKA, Shahar S. 'Timed Up and Go' test: Age, gender and cognitive impairment stratified normative values of older adults. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185641. eCollection 2017.

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.