Treatment Outcome of Short Implant Assisted Mandibular Overdenture

Overview

This study evaluates the use of short dental implants to support mandibular overdenture together with the use of laser therapy for treatment of patients with atrophic ridges. All participants will receive laser therapy; half of participants will receive two short implants and the other half will receive four short implants.

Full Title of Study: “Treatment Outcome of Short Implant Assisted Mandibular Overdenture in Combination With Low Level Laser Therapy”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: December 2023

Detailed Description

The conventional solution to complete edentulism is the use of complete removable dentures. One negative effect of edentulism is resorption of the edentulous ridge over time. Construction of a successful mandibular complete denture for patients with advanced mandibular ridge resorption is often difficult and on some occasions virtually impossible. It has been proved that when implants are placed, bone gets stimulated resulting in minimal bone loss. But anatomic limitations to implant placement have been observed in atrophic ridges, so short implants introduced as a recent alternative to aggressive surgical procedures proposed to compensate for tissue deficiency. Also, Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) has proven success in improving implant stability which is very crucial in short implants. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the treatment outcome of mandibular overdenture assisted by two short implants versus that assisted by four short implants in combination with LLLT.

Interventions

  • Combination Product: Two short implants and 2 minutes LLLT
    • Patients with edentulous atrophied mandibular ridge will receive 2 short dental implants and LLLT for 2 minutes.
  • Combination Product: Two short implants and 4 minutes LLLT
    • Patients with edentulous atrophied mandibular ridge will receive 2 short dental implants and LLLT for 4 minutes.
  • Combination Product: Four short implants and 2 minutes LLLT
    • Patients with edentulous atrophied mandibular ridge will receive 4 short dental implants and LLLT for 2 minutes.
  • Combination Product: Four short implants and 4 minutes LLLT
    • Patients with edentulous atrophied mandibular ridge will receive 4 short dental implants and LLLT for 4 minutes.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: Two short implants and 2 minutes LLLT
    • Patients receiving 2 short dental implants assisted mandibular over-denture and Low level laser therapy (LLLT) for 2 minutes .
  • Active Comparator: Two short implants and 4 minutes LLLT
    • Patients receiving 2 short dental implants assisted mandibular over-denture and LLLT for 2 minutes .
  • Active Comparator: Four short implants and 2 minutes LLLT
    • Patients receiving 4 short dental implants assisted mandibular over-denture and LLLT for 2 minutes .
  • Active Comparator: Four short implants and 4 minutes LLLT
    • Patients receiving 4 short dental implants assisted mandibular over-denture and LLLT for 4 minutes .

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Assessment of changes in implant stability (Implant Stability Quotient).
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months &12 months.
    • Implant stability can be defined as the absence of clinical mobility. It will be assessed at the time of implant placement (baseline) ,then six months and twelve months later, by the resonance frequency analysis using Osstel devise which measure implant oscillation frequency on the bone;Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) .

Secondary Measures

  • Peri-implant marginal bone changes.
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months &12 months.
    • Radiographic assessment of bone level changes around each implant will be performed to detect peri-implant crestal bone changes using standardised digital periapical x-ray. It will be assessed at the time of implant placement, six months and twelve months later.
  • Assessment of changes in peri-implant probing depth .
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months &12 months.
    • Peri-implant probing depth is the distance between the gingival margin and the most apically probeable portion, in millimetres. It will be measured at four sites of each implant (mesially, labially, distally, lingually) by using a graduated periodontal probe which will be held parallel to the long axis of the implant and introduced to the peri-implant sulcus till there is slight resistance. The mean record for each implant will be calculated. It will be evaluated at time of definitive prosthesis insertion then, six months and twelve months after implant placement.
  • Assessment of changes in modified gingival index
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months &12 months.
    • To qualify the degree of peri-implant inflammation, the modified gingival index will be used. It will be measured at four sites around each implant (mesially, labially, distally, lingually) and the mean record for each implant will be calculated. It will be evaluated at time of definitive prosthesis insertion, then six months and twelve months after implant placement.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Completely edentulous patients. – Patients with mandibular resorbed edentulous ridge. – Medically fit patients with no systemic conditions. – Class I ridge relation. – Adequate zone of keratinized mucosa. Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metabolic bone disease or unstable systemic condition. – Heavy smokers. – A history of radiotherapy in the head and neck region. – Physical or mental disability. – Temporomandibular and neuromuscular disorders.

Gender Eligibility: Male

Minimum Age: 45 Years

Maximum Age: 65 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Sara Zayed
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor-Investigator: Sara Zayed, Director – Alexandria University
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Sara Zayed, Study Director, Alexandria University

References

Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients–the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728.

Maniewicz S, Buser R, Duvernay E, Vazquez L, Loup A, Perneger TV, Schimmel M, Muller F. Short Dental Implants Retaining Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures in Very Old, Dependent Patients: Radiologic and Clinical Observation Up to 5 Years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):415-422. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5361.

Mandic B, Lazic Z, Markovic A, Mandic B, Mandic M, Djinic A, Milicic B. Influence of postoperative low-level laser therapy on the osseointegration of self-tapping implants in the posterior maxilla: a 6-week split-mouth clinical study. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 Mar;72(3):233-40. doi: 10.2298/vsp131202075m.

Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Mar;9(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.