Pain Inhibition and Facilitation in Recurrent Low Back Pain

Overview

This study evaluates psychophysical measures of pain inhibition and facilitation, along with cortical responses to different sensory stimuli, in patients with recurrent low back pain and matched healthy individuals.

Full Title of Study: “Pro-Nociceptive and Anti-Nociceptive Mechanisms Across an Episode of Recurrent Low Back Pain”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: December 14, 2018

Detailed Description

Pain inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the development of persistent low back pain; however, there is still debate on when changes in these mechanisms occur. Similarly, evoked cortical responses can reflect neuroplastic changes in pain processing regions, which are also thought to play a role in the transition to persistent pain, but there is also debate on when these neuroplastic changes develop relative to low back pain. Therefore, this study will use patients with an intermediary clinical pain state, recurrent low back pain, and matched healthy control participants, to investigate within and between subject differences in pain inhibitory, facilitatory and neuroplastic mechanisms.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Recurrent Low Back Pain Patients
    • Participants experiencing a current episode of their recurrent non-specific low back pain at the time of recruitment.
  • Healthy Volunteers
    • Participants matched in age and gender to one of the recurrent low back pain patients, with no significant past low back pain, chronic pain or other relevant medical disorders.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Conditioned Pain Modulation
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • Pressure pain threshold (kPa) as test stimulus before compared to during a pressure conditioning stimulus on the lower leg
  • Temporal Summation of Pain
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • Pain rating (VAS) change over a series of 10 repeated mechanical stimuli

Secondary Measures

  • Pressure Pain Thresholds
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • Threshold of pain detection (kPa) with handheld algometry over the low back and distant sites
  • Thermal Pain Thresholds
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • Hot and cold pain detection thresholds (degrees)
  • Two Point Discrimination
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • The smallest distance (mm) for which two separate points can be distinguished over the low back
  • Proprioceptive Weighting
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • Center of pressure displacement during 1-minute of quiet standing
  • Sensory Evoked Potentials
    • Time Frame: Day 0 vs. Day 28
    • EEG signals recorded in response to laser and electrical stimuli applied to the back

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion:

  • Healthy men and women – Aged 18-60 years – No previous back pain OR >1 previous episode of low back pain in past 12 months – No current back pain OR Pain in the region posteriorly between the inferior border of the 12th rib and the lower gluteal fold (low back pain) at time of recruitment lasting >24 hours – Able to speak, read and understand English Exclusion: – Pregnancy – First episode of low back pain – Low back pain associated with menstruation – Chronic low back pain (continuous pain episode for >3 months) – Currently seeking active treatment for low back pain – Red flags symptoms – Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs – Current or previous neurologic, musculoskeletal, mental, or other illnesses which may affect the trial – Current or previous chronic or recurrent pain condition other than low back pain – Current regular use of analgesic or other medication which may affect the trial – Lack of ability to cooperate – Recent history of acute pain particularly in the lower limbs (unless related to LBP) – Abnormally disrupted sleep in 24 hours preceding experiment

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 60 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Aalborg University
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Megan McPhee, PhD Fellow – Aalborg University
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Megan E McPhee, BPhty MSc, Principal Investigator, Aalborg University

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.