Incremental Haemodialysis in Incident Patients

Overview

Background: Incremental hemodialysis (HD) is a starting regime for renal replacement therapy (RRT) adapted to each patient's necessities. It is mainly conditioned by the residual renal function (RRF). The frequency of sessions with which patients start HD -one or two sessions per week-, is lower than that for conventional HD three times per week. Such frequency is increased (from one to two sessions, and from two to three sessions) as the RRF declines. Methods/Design: IHDIP is a multicenter randomized experimental open trial. It is randomized in a 1:1 ratio and controlled through usual clinical practice, with a low intervention level and non-commercial. It includes 152 patients older than 18 years with chronic renal disease stage 5 and start HD as RRT, with a RRF of ≥ 4ml/min/1.73m2, measured by renal clearance of urea (KrU). The intervention group includes 76 patients who will start with one session of HD per week (incremental HD). The control group includes 76 patients who will start with three sessions per week (conventional HD). The primary purpose is assessing the survival rate, while the secondary purposes are the morbidity rate (hospital admissions), the clinical parameters, the quality of life and the efficiency. Discussion: This study will enable us to know with the highest level of scientific evidence, the number of sessions a patient should receive when starting the HD treatment, depending on his/her RRF.

Full Title of Study: “Assessment of the Incremental Haemodialysis Security and Effectiveness in Incident Patients”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: October 2021

Detailed Description

Conventional thrice-weekly HD for 3 to 5 hours in a health center in an outpatient basis is the most used renal replacement therapy (RRT) regimen (1). However, it has an unacceptable high mortality rate (10%-20% a year). In order to try to improve those results, new regimens have been proposed. They are based on an increase of the HD dose and/or a higher number of sessions (2). Nevertheless, inconsistent results in terms of clinical benefits with such programs have been shown in recently published randomized and controlled trials (3,4), together with a lower rate of vascular access success (5) and a lower maintenance of the RRF (6) The National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiate (NKD KDOQI 2015)(1) 2015 guidelines allow the reduction in the weekly HD dose for patients with a residual kidney urea clearance (KrU) higher than 3ml/min/1.73m2. In these cases, the renal clearance (Kr) is added to the dialysis clearance (Kd) obtained in 2 sessions per week, thus obtaining the adequate dialysis dose (7,8) Surprisingly enough, few centers follow this recommendation when over 50% of patients start HD with KrU >3 mL/min (9). Authors like Kalantar-Zadeh et al (9,10) in the U.S.A. or Teruel et al (11) in Spain have published their experience with 2 HD sessions per week in incident patients. Through this regime they have shown that the RRF is preserved and the survival rate is similar to the one obtained with the conventional HD. This is due to the fact that the Kr has much greater clinical weight than Kd7, since the RRF contributes to the production of vitamin D and erythropoietine (12,13), and eliminates the protein-bound uremic toxins that are poorly dialyzed (13,14). In other words, the RRF plays a fundamental role both in the dialysis adequacy and in survival (15,16). Currently, some authors are questioning the number of HD sessions with which a patient should start the renal replacement therapy (RRT) (7, 17-19). Progressive HD is an initiation regimen adapted to the patient's RRF. The frequency increases as the daily diuretic level declines (7, 17-19). The IHDIP trial20 aims at determining whether or not starting with one HD session per week reduces mortality in incident patients and its influence in morbidity (hospital admissions), clinical parameters, quality of life and efficiency with regard to the patients who start RRT with the conventional method.

Interventions

  • Procedure: Incremental haemodialysis
    • It consists in reducing the frequency or number of sessions per week with which patients start the HD treatment. The experimental group will start with one session/week, then the number of weekly sessions will be increased to two and later to three as per criteria for progression
  • Procedure: Conventional haemodialysis
    • It is controlled through usual clinical practice, based on starting the HD treatment with three sessions per week (control group).

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Experimental group
    • 76 patients who start RRT with the incremental HD regimen.
  • Active Comparator: Control group
    • 76 patients who start RRT with the conventional HD (3 sessions per week)

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Survival rate
    • Time Frame: 24 months
    • Assess and compare survival in subjects with one session a week as an RRT starting regimen, compared to those patients who start RRT with the conventional method

Secondary Measures

  • Hospital admissions
    • Time Frame: 24 months
    • Number of hospitalizations, for any cause; and number of days hospitalized for any cause
  • Residual Kidney Function (RRF) maintenance .
    • Time Frame: 24 months
    • Reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and tubular function. Average urine volume and percentage of patients with anuria (≤200ml/day in two consecutive measurements).
  • Analysis of anemia
    • Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
    • Mean hemoglobin levels and Proportion of patients with Hb measurement inside the target range (10.5-12 g/dl) and The erythropoietin resistance index (ERI): ERI = weekly EPO (in UI)/patient’s weight (in kg)/Hb (in gr/dl)
  • Bone-mineral metabolism
    • Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
    • Mean levels of calcium, phosphorus and intac PTH levels. Estimate the percentage of patients within the therapeutic range; Calcium 8,4-9,5mg/dl, Phosphorus 3,5-5,5mg/dl and iPTH 150-300 pg/dl.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy levels
    • Time Frame: Basal, anual and end of the follow-un visit
  • Estimation of the effect of treatment on quality of life
    • Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
    • Quality of life survey values from Kidney Disease and Quality of Life (KDQOL’36 Spanish) will be registered.
  • Assessing RRT efficiency (costs)
    • Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
    • The number of sessions perform in subjects of incremental HDF group Vs number of sessions in the conventional HD group. The cost of each session is defined by the public contest for private haemodialysis clinics arranged by (that work to) the Health Service of Extremadura.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged >18 years, incident patients with stage 5 CKD who have chosen HD as RRT initiation. – RRF measured by KrU ≥ 4 ml/min/1.73m2. In general, it is advised not to start HD with a KrU> 7. – Informed consent signed before starting any activity related to the trial. Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unplanned HD initiation (established in point 7.4 of the protocol) – Non incident patients, in other words, patients who were previously on RRT, either on peritoneal dialysis, or on kidney transplant. – Active neoplasia at the moment of inclusion – Cardiovascular disease defined as: heart failure type IV of the New York Heart Association (NYHA), unstable angina or ischemic cardiopathy which has caused any admission in hospital in the last 3 months. – Cardiorenal syndrome – Active inflammatory disease with immunosuppressive treatment – Hepatorenal syndrome
  • Gender Eligibility: All

    Minimum Age: 18 Years

    Maximum Age: N/A

    Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

    Investigator Details

    • Lead Sponsor
      • Fundación para la Formación e Investigación de los Profesionales de la Salud de Extremadura
    • Collaborator
      • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide. Ferrol. A Coruña. (Spain)
    • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
      • Sponsor
    • Overall Official(s)
      • Javier L Deira Lorenzo, PhD MD, Principal Investigator, Servicio Extremeño de Salud
      • Miguel A Suarez Santisteban, MD, Principal Investigator, Servicio Extremeño de Salud
    • Overall Contact(s)
      • Javier L Deira Lorenzo, PhD MD, +34-661374085, deiralorenzo@gmail.com

    References

    National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):884-930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015. Review. Erratum in: Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Mar;67(3):534.

    Chan CT, Covic A, Craig JC, Davenport A, Kasiske BL, Kuhlmann MK, Levin NW, Li PK, Locatelli F, Rocco MV, Wheeler DC. Novel techniques and innovation in blood purification: a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int. 2013 Mar;83(3):359-71. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.450. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

    Chertow GM, Levin NW, Beck GJ, Daugirdas JT, Eggers PW, Kliger AS, Larive B, Rocco MV, Greene T; Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Trials Group. Long-Term Effects of Frequent In-Center Hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1830-6. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015040426. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

    Rocco MV, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Lockridge RS, Chan C, Pierratos A, Lindsay R, Larive B, Chertow GM, Beck GJ, Eggers PW, Kliger AS; FHN Trial Group. Long-term Effects of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis on Mortality: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Nocturnal Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Sep;66(3):459-68. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.02.331. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

    Suri RS, Larive B, Sherer S, Eggers P, Gassman J, James SH, Lindsay RM, Lockridge RS, Ornt DB, Rocco MV, Ting GO, Kliger AS; Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial Group. Risk of vascular access complications with frequent hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(3):498-505. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012060595. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

    Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Rocco MV, Kaysen GA, Depner TA, Levin NW, Chertow GM, Ornt DB, Raimann JG, Larive B, Kliger AS; FHN Trial Group. Effect of frequent hemodialysis on residual kidney function. Kidney Int. 2013 May;83(5):949-58. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.457. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

    Clark EG, Bagshaw SM. Unnecessary renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury is harmful for renal recovery. Semin Dial. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12300. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

    Mathew AT, Fishbane S, Obi Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Preservation of residual kidney function in hemodialysis patients: reviving an old concept. Kidney Int. 2016 Aug;90(2):262-271. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 May 12. Review.

    Patel N, Hu SL. Preserving residual renal function in dialysis: what we know. Semin Dial. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):250-8. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12302. Epub 2014 Sep 18. Review.

    Casino FG, Basile C. The variable target model: a paradigm shift in the incremental haemodialysis prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):182-190. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw339.

    Shafi T, Jaar BG, Plantinga LC, Fink NE, Sadler JH, Parekh RS, Powe NR, Coresh J. Association of residual urine output with mortality, quality of life, and inflammation in incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Aug;56(2):348-58. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.020. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

    van der Wal WM, Noordzij M, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, Korevaar JC, Geskus RB; Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis Study Group (NECOSAD). Full loss of residual renal function causes higher mortality in dialysis patients; findings from a marginal structural model. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Sep;26(9):2978-83. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq856. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

    Obi Y, Streja E, Rhee CM, Ravel V, Amin AN, Cupisti A, Chen J, Mathew AT, Kovesdy CP, Mehrotra R, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Incremental Hemodialysis, Residual Kidney Function, and Mortality Risk in Incident Dialysis Patients: A Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Aug;68(2):256-265. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

    Wong J, Vilar E, Davenport A, Farrington K. Incremental haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Oct;30(10):1639-48. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv231. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Review.

    Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group. Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Apr;15(4):1061-70.

    Vilar E, Wellsted D, Chandna SM, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Residual renal function improves outcome in incremental haemodialysis despite reduced dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Aug;24(8):2502-10. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp071. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

    Zhang M, Wang M, Li H, Yu P, Yuan L, Hao C, Chen J, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Association of initial twice-weekly hemodialysis treatment with preservation of residual kidney function in ESRD patients. Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(2):140-50. doi: 10.1159/000365819. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

    Fernández Lucas M, Teruel JL. Incremental hemodialysis schedule at the start of renal replacement therapy. Nefrologia. 2017 Jan – Feb;37(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Oct 1. English, Spanish.

    Toth-Manikowski SM, Shafi T. Hemodialysis Prescription for Incident Patients: Twice Seems Nice, But Is It Incremental? Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Aug;68(2):180-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.04.005.

    Caria S, Cupisti A, Sau G, Bolasco P. The incremental treatment of ESRD: a low-protein diet combined with weekly hemodialysis may be beneficial for selected patients. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Oct 29;15:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-172.

    Bolasco P, Cupisti A, Locatelli F, Caria S, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Dietary Management of Incremental Transition to Dialysis Therapy: Once-Weekly Hemodialysis Combined With Low-Protein Diet. J Ren Nutr. 2016 Nov;26(6):352-359. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Feb 28. Review. Erratum in: J Ren Nutr. 2017 Jan;27(1):74.

    Libetta C, Esposito P, Dal Canton A. Once-weekly hemodialysis: a single-center experience. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Feb;65(2):343. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.034.

    Parra Moncasi E, Arenas Jiménez MD, Alonso M, Martínez MF, Gámen Pardo A, Rebollo P, Ortega Montoliú T, Martínez Terrer T, Alvarez-Ude F; Grupo de Gestión de la Calidad de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Multicentre study of haemodialysis costs. Nefrologia. 2011;31(3):299-307. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Apr.10813. English, Spanish.

    Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

    At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.