Prosthesis Versus Osteosynthesis in Proximal Tibia Fractures

Overview

The aim of this study is to compare knee function and pain one year after treatment of intra-articular proximal tibia fracture using either osteosynthesis with a locking plate (ORIF) or primary total knee replacement (TKR) in patients over 65 years of age.

Full Title of Study: “Prosthesis Versus Osteosynthesis in Treatment of Intra-articular Fractures of Proximal Tibia: A Randomized, Controlled, Trial”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: June 2024

Detailed Description

Intra-articular proximal tibial fractures are relatively common in the elderly. They constitute 8% of all fractures in patients over 65 years. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the golden standard treatment for these fractures. The treatment with ORIF is associated with significant co-morbidity due to complicating concomitant factors, such as osteoporosis, poor co-operation, infection and inadequate stability of osteosynthesis. A high failure rate (30-79 %) of fixation of tibia plateau fractures in elderly people has been reported. Most of these fractures occur in elderly persons who are at risk to lose their ability to walk independently, because of partial immobilization is required initially and full weight bearing is not allowed during 6 to 8 weeks after the operation. The risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis has been reported to be 5.3-times higher than in the normal population even if adequate stability is achieved and other conditions normalized for fracture healing. It has also been reported that total knee replacement (TKR) performed for post-traumatic arthritis after tibial plateau fracture lead to worse outcome compared with TKR due to primary osteoarthritis. In addition, previous operations increase the risk of complications after TKR. The complication rate in secondary TKR has been reported to be over 18 %. The available data regarding TKR as a primary treatment option for proximal tibial plateau fracture suggest that fast mobilization and return to normal daily activities may be achieved. These data also suggest a low rate of complications. There are no randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of the traditional treatment option (open reduction- internal fixation, ORIF) and TKR as primary treatment of these fractures. In this study investigators compare the outcomes of locking plate osteosynthesis and total knee arthroplasty according to Oxford knee score, pain, ability to walk, or quality of life one year after randomization in 98 patients aged over 65 years.

Interventions

  • Procedure: Locking plate
    • Osteosynthesis
  • Procedure: TKR
    • Total knee arthroplasty

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: ORIF (open reduction-internal fixation)
    • Osteosynthesis with locking plate(s) will be performed using medial and/or lateral incision, according to morphology of the fracture. Additional osteosynthesis material will be used when necessary. The articular surface will be reduced and bone transplantation or bone substitute used if required. Postoperatively, touch-down weight bearing will be allowed for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of half-weight-bearing period. A walker or wheelchair will be used when necessary.
  • Experimental: TKR (total knee replacement)
    • Arthroplasty of the knee will be performed within two weeks after the fracture. Medial parapatellar approach will be used. The minimal possible constraint of the prosthesis (cruciate retaining, posterior cruciate sacrificing or semi-constrained) will be used. A possible insufficient bone stock may be rebuilt with augments. Hinged prosthesis will be used only if stability of the medial collateral ligament is insufficient. A cemented or uncemented tibial stem extender (minimum length 50mm) will be used in all cases. Additional osteosynthesis will be used when necessary. Postoperatively, the patients will be allowed full weight bearing as tolerated.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Knee function
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Oxford knee score 12 months after randomisation

Secondary Measures

  • Change in knee function
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years
    • Change in Oxford knee score
  • Change in pain
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years
    • Numeric rating scale (rest, night, exercise)
  • Change in physical performance
    • Time Frame: 6 weeks (TKR only), 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years
    • Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
  • Change in quality of life
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years
    • Short form-36 (SF-36)
  • Reoperations
    • Time Frame: Up to 10 years following randomisation
    • Need for revision surgery
  • Satisfaction
    • Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years
    • Satisfaction with knee (Numeric rating scale, range 0 to 10)

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Acute intra-articular proximal tibia fracture with impression of the joint cartilage (Schatzker grades II to VI) – Impression of tibial plateau min 2 mm – Intact patellar tendon – The patient accepts both treatment options (osteosynthesis and arthroplasty) Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not voluntary – Previous arthroplasty of the knee – Previous fracture affecting the knee joint – Inability to co-operate – Not independent (institutionalized living before fracture) – Severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4) – Open fracture (Gustilo grade 2 or over) – Progressive metastatic malign disease – Multiple fractures requiring operative treatment – Severe soft tissue injury around the knee (Tscherne classification grade 3) – Avulsion fracture of the patellar tendon or concomitant patellar tendon tear – Inability to walk before fracture – Severe medical comorbidities – Body Mass Index over 40 – Unacceptably high risk of surgery due to severe medical comorbidities – Significant arterial or nerve trauma – Severe substance abuse

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 65 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Central Finland Hospital District
  • Collaborator
    • Tampere University Hospital
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Juha Paloneva, Department head, adjunct professor – Central Finland Hospital District
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Central Finland Hospital
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD, +358 14 2693119, juha.paloneva@ksshp.fi

References

Houdek MT, Watts CD, Shannon SF, Wagner ER, Sems SA, Sierra RJ. Posttraumatic Total Knee Arthroplasty Continues to Have Worse Outcome Than Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

Wasserstein D, Henry P, Paterson JM, Kreder HJ, Jenkinson R. Risk of total knee arthroplasty after operatively treated tibial plateau fracture: a matched-population-based cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 15;96(2):144-50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01691.

Somersalo A, Paloneva J, Kautiainen H, Lonnroos E, Heinanen M, Kiviranta I. Incidence of fractures requiring inpatient care. Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):525-30. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.908340. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

Malviya A, Reed MR, Partington PF. Acute primary total knee arthroplasty for peri-articular knee fractures in patients over 65 years of age. Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1368-71. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.198. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Kini SG, Sathappan SS. Role of navigated total knee arthroplasty for acute tibial fractures in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Aug;133(8):1149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1792-8. Epub 2013 Jun 16.

Shimizu T, Sawaguchi T, Sakagoshi D, Goshima K, Shigemoto K, Hatsuchi Y. Geriatric tibial plateau fractures: Clinical features and surgical outcomes. J Orthop Sci. 2016 Jan;21(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Dec 6.

Haufe T, Forch S, Muller P, Plath J, Mayr E. The Role of a Primary Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Proximal Tibia Fractures in Orthogeriatric Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6047876. doi: 10.1155/2016/6047876. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.