Teaching Improved Communication To Adolescents and Clinicians

Overview

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention aimed at improving how adolescent patients and their clinicians communicate about behavior change.

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Other
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: October 29, 2018

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a randomized pilot trial across two health systems, Duke University and University of Michigan to evaluate the effect of Feedback Guides on clinician-adolescent communication about high-risk behaviors. – The investigators consent clinicians prior to any patient recruitment. – When a patient aged 12-21 years arrives for an annual visit and is a patient of a consented clinician, the front desk staff will provide the teen with an iPad tablet. – As part of standard clinical care, all teens will complete the Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS) questionnaire on the tablet privately (either in waiting room or in clinic room while waiting for the provider). – The patient and parent will then review a study explanation and informed consent on the tablet and sign electronically if they agree to participate. The study clinician will review the informed consent with the patient and answer any questions. – Participating teens will then complete a brief baseline survey and those randomized to the intervention arm will print the visit conversation guides using a wireless study printer connected to the tablet. The guides will print in a designated nursing area and clinic staff will add the printed guides to visit-related paperwork for the patient and clinician to use during the visit. – The teen patient audio records the encounter on the tablet. – The patient completes post-visit patient survey on tablet. – The clinician completes a post-visit survey on paper. – The patient returns tablet to clinic staff. – The iPad will be connected to a study workstation, where the iTunes application will be used to transfer the audio file from the Voice Memos app to the workstation and then to it's final destination on the file server. Once the transfer has been confirmed, using iTunes, the audio file will be deleted from both the iPad and the workstation, including any residual versions of the audio file. – Three months after the encounter, staff will provide participating patients a link to a REDCap survey (not the survey itself). The link will be sent using the preferred method selected by the patient through a question in the baseline survey – email or short message service (SMS). To protect the confidentiality of the responses, we will also provide the participant a code to access the REDCap follow-up survey. This will prevent others from accessing the survey results.

Interventions

  • Behavioral: Communication Intervention
    • In this study, Investigators are testing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a systems intervention that asks adolescents to report their risk behaviors before their encounter. Both clinicians and patients will receive a Feedback Guide that gives them tips on effective ways to communicate about these behaviors.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Communication Intervention
    • Investigators are testing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a systems intervention that asks adolescents to report their risk behaviors before their encounter. Both clinicians and patients will receive a Feedback Guide that gives them tips on effective ways to communicate about these behaviors.
  • No Intervention: Standard Of Care
    • Investigators will compare patients randomized into the intervention group to those who receive standard of care.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Feasibility as measured by recruitment number
    • Time Frame: 9 months
    • We will consider the intervention feasible if we recruit 20 adolescent patients and up to 10 clinicians per site.

Secondary Measures

  • Acceptability
    • Time Frame: 9 months
    • To determine acceptability, we will examine patients’ reports of rated helpfulness of the intervention. To be deemed acceptable, 75% would have to rate it as a “4” or “5” on the 5-point scale

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • All English-speaking adolescent patients – cognitively able to participate Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescents less than 12 years of age – Adolescents over 21 years of age – cognitively unable to participate.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 12 Years

Maximum Age: 21 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Duke University
  • Collaborator
    • University of Michigan
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Kathryn Pollak, PhD, Principal Investigator, Duke University

Citations Reporting on Results

Hoglund AT, Winblad U, Arnetz B, Arnetz JE. Patient participation during hospitalization for myocardial infarction: perceptions among patients and personnel. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):482-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00738.x.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.