Feasibility Study of Using Navigational Bronchoscopy to Perform PDT-Photofrin® in Unresectable Peripheral Lung Cancer

Overview

This research study is being conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of using a new developed bronchoscopic technology called electronavigational bronchoscopy to treat subjects with solid tumor in peripheral lung, who are inoperable or refused surgery. It will involve 10 sites in USA and Canada. Participation will last 6 months.

Full Title of Study: “Multicenter, Prospective, OL, Single-arm Clinical Study of Safety & Feasibility of Using Navigational Bronchoscopy to Perform Interstitial PD Therapy Using Photofrin® as Treatment in Subjects With Unresectable Solid Tumor in Peripheral Lung”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: N/A
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: April 12, 2019

Detailed Description

Lung cancer accounts for almost one-third of cancer deaths. Cancer screening strategies have the potential to achieve a 20% reduction in death rates. Newly developed bronchoscopic technologies (such as navigational bronchoscopy) have shown to enable physicians to safely reach lesions in peripheral regions of the lung and obtain diagnosis. This new technology may now potentially offer bronchoscopic therapeutic interventions, such as photodynamic therapy, to tumors that were previously unreachable due to their peripheral anatomic location. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses a combination of a photosensitizing drug (a drug that is activated by light), called porfimer sodium (Photofrin®), and a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the abnormal area using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber [like a fishing line] that permits light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube called bronchoscope. The light activates the porfimer sodium, which is concentrated in the abnormal tissue, leading to its destruction. The purpose of this study is to determine if physicians can reach the tumors in the periphery of the lung via electronavigational bronchoscopy and deliver the photodynamic therapy by placing the optical fiber into the tumor.

Interventions

  • Drug: Porfimer sodium
    • After injection of porfimer sodium (Photofrin®), a flexible bronchoscopy with navigation guidance will be performed to confirm the location and the size of the lesion with the use of radial probe endobronchial ultrasonography (REBUS). A light dose of 200 J/cm of diffuser length will be delivered.
  • Device: Fiber optic
    • A fiber optic diffuser length matching the tumor length will be placed in the lesion under fluoroscopy guidance.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Photodynamic therapy-Photofrin
    • Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the i.v. injection of 2 mg/kg-porfimer sodium (Photofrin®) followed by illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device during navigational bronchoscopy. Two days after the injection, a laser light will be applied to the tumor.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Feasibility to Perform Interstitial-Photodynamic Therapy (i-PDT) Into Tumor
    • Time Frame: Day 3 post-treatment
    • Number of times photodynamic therapy was delivered into the tumor using navigational bronchoscopy for each subject.
  • Adverse Events Incidence Indicating Safety of Navigational Bronchoscopy-interstitial-Photodynamic Therapy (i-PDT)
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • The incidence of adverse events following navigational bronchoscopy-iPDT (interstitial-Photodynamic Therapy) will be presented as the primary safety indicator for this treatment.

Secondary Measures

  • Tumor Response at 3 Months Post Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
    • Time Frame: Up to 3 months
    • From the start of treatment until 3 months post-treatment measured as per the Modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria
  • Tumor Response at Study Exit (6 Months) Post Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • From the start of treatment until 6 months post-treatment measured as per the Modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at Screening (Days -14 to -1). Baseline.
    • Time Frame: up to day 0 (-14 to -1 days)
    • Measured at screening to be the baseline measure. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at Day 1 (Date of Photofrin Injection).
    • Time Frame: 1 day
    • Measured at Day 1 which is day of the photofrin injection. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at Day 3 (Day of Photodynamic Therapy)
    • Time Frame: Day 3
    • Measured at Day 3. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at Day 30 (30 Days Post Photofrin Injection)
    • Time Frame: Day 30
    • Measured at Day 3. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at 3 Months Post Photofrin Injection
    • Time Frame: up to 3 months
    • Measured at 3 months. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Performance Status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score at 6 Months Post Photofrin Injection
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • Measured at 6 months. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores range from 0 to 5. The lowest values mean a better outcome: 0 is fully active with no performance restrictions; 1 is strenuous physical activity restricted but fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work; 2 is capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities – up and about >50% of waking hours; 3 is capable of only limited self-care and confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; and 4 is completely disable, cannot carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair.
  • Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Baseline
    • Time Frame: Baseline
    • The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. SF-36 evaluates 9 dimensions of Health: physical function, role limitations due to physical health problems, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems domain, and mental health. Summary is provided in the form of physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) for each of the timepoints.
  • Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Follow-up Visit at 3 Months.
    • Time Frame: up to 3 months
    • The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. SF-36 evaluates 9 dimensions of Health: physical function, role limitations due to physical health problems, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems domain, and mental health. Summary is provided in the form of physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) for each of the timepoints.
  • Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Study Exit (6 Month Visit)
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. SF-36 evaluates 9 dimensions of Health: physical function, role limitations due to physical health problems, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems domain, and mental health. Summary is provided in the form of physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) for each of the timepoints.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 Item (QLQ-C30): Baseline
    • Time Frame: Baseline
    • Baseline score of EORTC QLQ-C30 which is a multi-dimensional Health Related Quality of Life measure designed for use in lung cancer patients. Includes 5 functional measures (physical, role, emotional, social, cognitive), 8 symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea) and global health status and financial impact. Most items use 4-item scale from “not at all” to “very much”. Raw scores are transformed to 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better functioning/Quality of Life and greater symptom burden.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 Item (QLQ-C30): Follow-up 3 Months
    • Time Frame: up to 3 months
    • 3 month score of EORTC QLQ-C30 which is a multi-dimensional Health Related Quality of Life measure designed for use in lung cancer patients. Includes 5 functional measures (physical, role, emotional, social, cognitive), 8 symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea) and global health status and financial impact. Most items use 4-item scale from “not at all” to “very much”. Raw scores are transformed to 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better functioning/Quality of Life and greater symptom burden.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 Item (QLQ-C30): 6 Months
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • 6 month score of EORTC QLQ-C30 which is a multi-dimensional Health Related Quality of Life measure designed for use in lung cancer patients. Includes 5 functional measures (physical, role, emotional, social, cognitive), 8 symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea) and global health status and financial impact. Most items use 4-item scale from “not at all” to “very much”. Raw scores are transformed to 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better functioning/Quality of Life and greater symptom burden.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- Point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Lung Cancer 13 Item (QLQ-LC13): Baseline Score
    • Time Frame: Baseline
    • Baseline measure for EORTC QLQ-LC13 which is a 13-item lung cancer-specific questionnaire module. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-C30. It is comprised of multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer associated symptoms (coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, pain) and side effects from conventional chem-and radiotherapy (alopecia, neuropathy, sore mouth, dysphagia). For these symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms. The scale is from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The scoring (as reported here) is from 0 to 100 with the higher score meaning a more severe symptom.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- Point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Lung Cancer 13 Item (QLQ-LC13): Follow-up 3 Month Score
    • Time Frame: up to 3 months
    • 3-Month measure for EORTC QLQ-LC13 which is a 13-item lung cancer-specific questionnaire module. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-C30. It is comprised of multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer associated symptoms (coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, pain) and side effects from conventional chem-and radiotherapy (alopecia, neuropathy, sore mouth, dysphagia). For these symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms. The scale is from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The scoring (as reported here) is from 0 to 100 with the higher score meaning a more severe symptom.
  • Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- Point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Lung Cancer 13 Item (QLQ-LC13): Study Exit (6 Months) Score
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • 6-Month measure for EORTC QLQ-LC13 which is a 13-item lung cancer-specific questionnaire module. It is used in conjunction with the QLQ-C30. It is comprised of multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer associated symptoms (coughing, hemoptysis, dyspnea, pain) and side effects from conventional chem-and radiotherapy (alopecia, neuropathy, sore mouth, dysphagia). For these symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms. The scale is from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The scoring (as reported here) is from 0 to 100 with the higher score meaning a more severe symptom.
  • Number of Participants With Indicated Adverse Events
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months post-treatment
    • Adverse events (AEs) noted by number of participants with at least one event. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject during the course of the study, regardless of causal relationship. AEs were coded using MedDRA Version 21.1
  • Number of Subjects With at Least One Serious Adverse Event
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • The number of subjects with at least one serious adverse event are listed.
  • Safety: Physical Examination Summaries for Each Subject
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • Safety evaluation will include the physical examinations summary of non-normal findings for each subject.
  • Safety: Number of Participants With Indicated Vital Sign Summaries
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • Safety evaluation included vital sign summary for each subject. Vital signs included pulse, blood pressure, temperature and respiration rate. Only clinically relevant results, as per the investigator judgement, are included. These would be vital signs that are out of the normal range but could be considered outside enough to be clinically relevant to the subject’s health.
  • Safety: Number of Participants With Indicated Changes to Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) Related to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • The treatment emergent adverse events related to PFTs are noted. Pulmonary function test measurements were: Diffusion Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%), Expiratory Reserve Volume (mL), Forced Vital Capacity (mL), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (mL), Forced Expiratory Flow 25% to 75% (L/min), Functional Residual Capacity (mL), Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (L/min), Residual Volume (mL), Peak Expiratory Flow (L/min), Slow Vital Capacity (mL), Total Lung Capacity (mL)
  • Safety: Laboratory Test Summaries for Each Subject
    • Time Frame: Up to 6 months
    • Safety evaluation includes laboratory tests summarized for each subject with any abnormal lab results considered an Adverse Event to be listed. The investigators commented on any laboratory value outside the normal reference range. If the value was judged to be an Adverse Event, it is listed. The values analysed were: Hematology (Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, White Blood Cell, Red Blood Cell, Platelet Count, Prothrombin Time) and Chemistry (Glucose (random), Blood Urea Nitrogen, Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride), Creatinine, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Total Bilirubin, Albumin, Total Protein)

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female aged 18 or older – Diagnosed with histologically confirmed solid tumor located in the peripheral lung – Not candidate for curative surgery, is unfit for surgery, or does not wish to undergo curative surgery – May be candidate for, have failed, or does not wish to undergo radiation therapy – The tumor is ≤ 3 cm in size and clearly observable in computerized tomography (CT scan) – Able to sign an informed consent Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostic of small cell lung cancer – Solid tumor located in central lung – Presence of concurrent non-solid malignancy – Abnormal blood results – Received chemotherapy/immunotherapy in the last 4 weeks – Tumor invades a major blood vessel – Porphyria or known hypersensitivity to Photofrin® or porphyrin-like compounds or to any of its excipients – Planned surgical procedure within the next 90 days – Coexisting ophthalmic disease likely to require slit-lamp examination within the next 90 days – Acute or chronic medical or psychological illnesses that prevent endoscopy procedures – Pregnant or intend to become pregnant, breastfeeding or intend to breastfeed during the study – Received PDT during the past 3 months – Severe impairment of your kidney or liver function – Participates or intends to participate in another drug study (other than observational studies) during the study

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Concordia Laboratories Inc.
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Michelle Depot, Ph.D., Study Director, at the request of Concordia Laboratories Inc.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.