A Study of High-Dose Chemoradiation Using Biologically-Based Target Volume Definition in Patients With Glioblastoma

Overview

This is a study to determine the safety and effectiveness of high-dose radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Full Title of Study: “Phase II Study of High Dose Radiotherapy and Concurrent Temozolomide Using Biologically-Based Target Volume Definition in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: N/A
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: February 6, 2020

Detailed Description

After analysis demonstrated the improved prognostic value of identifying both hypercellular tumor (TVHCV) based on high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and hyperperfused tumor (TVCBV) based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), the study was amended and later-enrolled patients boosted to both TVHCV and TVCBV.

Interventions

  • Radiation: High Dose Radiation
    • Radiation will be delivered once daily for a total of 30 fractions, five days per week.
  • Drug: Temozolomide
    • Patients will receive concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m^2 daily for 6 weeks). Adjuvant temozolomide will be given at 150-200 mg/m^2, D1-5 every 28 days for a minimum of six cycles and will be started approximately four weeks following completion of radiotherapy.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: High Dose Chemoradiation
    • Patients will receive high dose radiation based in part on advanced imaging, and concurrent temozolomide. Four weeks after the completion of chemoradiation, patients will receive adjuvant temozolomide.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Overall Survival at 12 Months
    • Time Frame: 12 months after completion of chemoradiation
    • Percentage of patients alive at 12 months after completion of chemoradiation
  • Median Overall Survival
    • Time Frame: Median follow-up time was 26 months
    • Median overall survival in months

Secondary Measures

  • Median Progression-free Survival
    • Time Frame: Median follow-up time was 26 months
    • From start of RT until disease progression or death, or until date of last imaging follow-up, estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Progression is defined by any of the following: >= 25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions (compared with baseline if no decrease) on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids; a significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan or best response after initiation of therapy, not due to comorbid events; appearance of any new lesions; clear progression of non-measurable lesions; or definite clinical deterioration not attributable to causes other than tumor, or to decrease in corticosteroid dose. When pathologic confirmation was unavailable, progression was defined as worsening enhancement based on imaging with or without adjunctive advanced imaging including perfusion MRI or magnetic resonance spectroscopy, when clinically indicated.
  • Median Change in Tumor Volume From Baseline to Mid-radiation Treatment (Week 4)
    • Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
    • Tumor volume will be measured by diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI before treatment start and at mid-treatment.
  • Percentage of Patients That Experienced Deterioration in Quality of Life (QOL)
    • Time Frame: Baseline to 1 and 7 months
    • Percentage of patients that experienced deterioration in QOL per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 ‘Not at All’ to 4 ‘Very Much’); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 ‘Very Poor’ to 7 ‘Excellent’). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.
  • Percentage of Patients With Failure; Central or In-field vs. Marginal or Distant
    • Time Frame: Median 26 months
    • Failures will be classified as central or in-field, marginal or distant based on previously published criteria. 1) “central,” in which 95% or more of the recurrent tumor volume (Vrecur) was within D95, the region treated to high dose (95% of the prescription dose); 2) “in-field,” in which 80% or more of Vrecur was within the D95 isodose surface; 3) “marginal,” when between 20 and 80% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface; 4) “outside,” in which less than 20% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Newly diagnosed histologically-confirmed supratentorial World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV gliomas including glioblastoma multiforme and gliosarcoma – Age 18 or older – Karnofsky performance status (a measure to quantify general well being and activities of daily life; scale ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is perfect health) of greater than or equal to 70 – Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks – Adequate bone marrow reserve (hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10, absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1500, platelets greater than or equal to 100,000); acceptable liver function (total bilirubin less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl, ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase)/AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) less than or equal to 5 times the normal range); acceptable renal function (serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl). Eligibility level for hemoglobin may be reached by transfusion. – Maximal contiguous volume of tumor based on high b-value diffusion MRI < 1/3 volume of brain – Patients must be registered within 6 weeks of most recent resection. – Patients must have signed a study-specific informed consent. Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent glioma, or tumor involving the brainstem or cerebellum. Prior low-grade glioma without prior RT, now with malignant progression are eligible. – Prior use of Gliadel wafers or any other intratumoral or intracavitary treatment is not permitted. Prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable, except for Temozolomide or Bevacizumab. – Evidence of cerebrospinal fluid dissemination (positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology for malignancy or MRI findings consistent with CSF dissemination) – Evidence of severe concurrent disease requiring treatment – Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 3 years (for example, carcinoma in situ of breast, oral cavity or cervix are all permissible) – Patients unable to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging exams (MRI) (i.e. patients with non-compatible devices such as cardiac pacemakers, other implanted electronic devices, metallic prostheses, or ferromagnetic prostheses (e.g. pins in artificial joints and surgical pins/clips) or unable to receive gadolinium for MRI, as per the standard UM Department of Radiology MRI screening criteria) – Patients treated with previous cranial or head/neck radiotherapy leading to radiation field overlap – Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 14 days prior to registration. Patients with reproductive potential must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during treatment.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Michelle Kim, M.D., Principal Investigator, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Citations Reporting on Results

Lee SW, Fraass BA, Marsh LH, Herbort K, Gebarski SS, Martel MK, Radany EH, Lichter AS, Sandler HM. Patterns of failure following high-dose 3-D conformal radiotherapy for high-grade astrocytomas: a quantitative dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jan 1;43(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00266-1.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.