Correlation of Anal Acoustic Reflectometry Parameters With Degree of Rectal Intussusception and Prolapse

Overview

Anal Acoustic Reflectometry (AAR) is a reliable and reproducible technique that has been studied in our department over the last 6 years. Sound waves pass into a balloon placed in the anal canal and are used to measure the cross-sectional area. By gradually increasing and decreasing the pressure in the balloon the investigators can measure the pressure at which the cross-sectional area starts to increase and decrease, and the anal canal starts to open and close. This assessment mimics the natural opening and closing of the anal canal and the effect of squeezing the muscles. Rectal intussusception occurs when the rectal wall telescopes into itself distally and is termed prolapse when it protrudes through the anal canal. Not all patients will require surgery and, for some, it can lead to debilitating symptoms of constipation, pain and faecal incontinence. Currently, the Oxford grading system through radiological testing is used for classifying severity of rectal intussusception and prolapse; however this does not give us sufficient information about the anal sphincter muscles. The gold standard investigation of the anal sphincter muscles has been manometry which measures anal canal pressure at rest and during squeeze. However, it has limitations. In previous studies AAR has shown promise in the assessment of faecal incontinence and, that unlike manometry, it has been able to distinguish between different types of incontinence. Thus far, it has not been studied in patients with rectal intussusception and it is hoped that AAR parameters may provide an indication of when rectal intussusception becomes overt rectal prolapse. This can inform the clinician to guide further management of a group of patients with a condition that can have significant impact on quality of life.

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: November 2016

Detailed Description

This an observational study based on not intervention. Patients are grouped depending on grade of prolapse, and all undergo the routine AAR investigation. Patients are grouped solely on differences in pathology already present and not on any intervention.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Rectal Intussusception and Prolapse
    • AAR measurements will be taken from patients with suspected intra-rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse. Subgroup analysis will be performed after grading of rectal prolapse according to the Oxford Grading system. The subgroups will be: Oxford Grades 1 & 2 – intra-rectal intussusception Oxford Grades 3 & 4 – intra-anal intussusception Oxford grade 5 – Overt Rectal Prolapse

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Opening Pressure
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • The pressure (in cmH20) at which the anal canl just begins to open

Secondary Measures

  • Opening Elastance
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • in cmH20/mm2 – the resistance of the anal canal to stretch
  • Closing Pressure
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • The pressure (cmH20) at whihc the anal canal just closes
  • Closing Elastance
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • In cmH20/mm2 – the ability of the anal canal to close after a period of stretch
  • Hysteresis
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • measured as “%” – the percentage energy dissipated during opening and closing of the anal canal at rest
  • Squeeze Opening Pressure
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • the pressure (cmH2O) at whihc the anal canal opens during volunatry anal contraction
  • Squeeze Opening Elastance
    • Time Frame: at specific time point of measurement up to 1 hour
    • the resistance of the anal canal to stretch during voluntary contraction

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults over 18 years old – Have capacity to consent to the study – Patients with pelvic floor dysfunction and symptoms of rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors under the age of 18 years old – Patients who lack capacity to consent – Patients without pelvic floor dysfunction or symptoms of rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Karen J Telford, Study Chair, University Hospital of South Manchester

References

Klarskov N, Saaby ML, Lose G. A faster urethral pressure reflectometry technique for evaluating the squeezing function. Scand J Urol. 2013 Dec;47(6):529-33. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.776629. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

Hornung BR, Mitchell PJ, Carlson GL, Klarskov N, Lose G, Kiff ES. Comparative study of anal acoustic reflectometry and anal manometry in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1718-24. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8943. Erratum In: Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(2):301.

Mitchell PJ, Klarskov N, Telford KJ, Hosker GL, Lose G, Kiff ES. Viscoelastic assessment of anal canal function using acoustic reflectometry: a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823b2499.

Mitchell PJ, Klarskov N, Telford KJ, Hosker GL, Lose G, Kiff ES. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new reproducible technique providing physiological assessment of anal sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1122-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318223fbcb.

Collinson R, Cunningham C, D'Costa H, Lindsey I. Rectal intussusception and unexplained faecal incontinence: findings of a proctographic study. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jan;11(1):77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01539.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.