Cortisone Injection vs Trigger Point Dry Needling Fin the Treatment of Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine if trigger point dry needling (TDN) is as effective as cortisone injection (CI) in reducing pain and improving function in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS).

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Single (Participant)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: July 2015

Detailed Description

This study aims to investigate the potential of TDN as an effective alternative to CI for patients with GTPS by directly comparing pain and functional outcomes of patients receiving TDN or CI for the treatment of GTPS over a 6 week period. The investigators hypothesize that patients treated with TDN will be equally improved in pain and function as those treated with CI. If TDN is demonstrated to be equally or more effective than steroid injection in this pilot study, then the investigators have the basis to launch larger studies. Ultimately, the investigators want to determine if TDN is an effective treatment alternative for GTPS for providers and patients who want to avoid the potential detrimental side-effects of steroids. Approach: Prospective, randomized, partially-blinded design Aim: To determine if administration of TDN is as effective as CI in reducing lateral hip pain and improving function in patients diagnosed with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The investigators expect to demonstrate effectiveness of TDN in the treatment of GTPS to a degree that is equal to CI. Doing so would prompt further outcomes research for TDN. Supportive research and subsequent clinical acceptance of TDN as a primary treatment for this condition would offer an alternative to patients who want or need to avoid steroids. Based on the literature, this is the first study to investigate the effectiveness of TDN in the treatment of GTPS and directly compare pain and functional outcomes of patients receiving TDN versus CI for the treatment of GTPS. Methods. Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks. Numerical pain and functional ratings for each patient will be collected at 0, 1, 3, and 6 weeks of treatment. Data analysis will determine if TDN is as effective as cortisone.

Interventions

  • Drug: Cortisone Injection
    • Exact location and technique of injection within the region of the involved greater trochanter will be determined by the provider. The number of f/u visits within 6 wks following initiation of treatment will be determined by the provider, but CI is the only treatment.
  • Procedure: Trigger Point Dry Needling
    • Exact location of needle insertion, technique and number of penetrations within the region of the involved posterolateral hip will be determined by the provider. The number of f/u visits within 6 wks following initiation of treatment will be determined by the provider, but TDN is the only treatment.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: Cortisone Injection
    • Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be carried out at the 1st visit following consent according to SOC. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks.
  • Active Comparator: Trigger Point Dry Needling
    • Fifty patients with GTPS will be randomized into a CI or TDN group. Treatment will be carried out at the 1st visit following consent according to SOC. Treatment will be administered according to standard of care for up to 6 weeks.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Participants change in pain rating scores from baseline to 6 weeks will be accessed.
    • Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
  • Patient specific function score (PSPS) from baseline to 6 weeks will be accessed.
    • Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18+ years old – lateral hip pain (anywhere from iliac crest to mid ITB) – active email account Exclusion Criteria:

  • low back pain associated with the hip pain – motor and/or sensory impairment consistent with radiculopathy – active infection/malignancy of the hip – connective tissue disease – pregnancy – non-English speaking

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Scott and White Hospital & Clinic
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Kindyle L Brennan, PhD, Principal Investigator, Orthopedic Therapist

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.