The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry

Overview

This study is a national registry of patients treated with renal denervation (RD) in the Netherlands. The aim of the study is to collect data on safety of the procedure, predictors of the blood pressure lowering effect, sustainability of the effect and to assess the cardiovascular event rate in patients treated with renal denervation. This is a prospective observational study.

Full Title of Study: “Safety, Success Rate and Long Term Consequences of Renal Denervation in Patients With Therapy Resistant Hypertension. The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational [Patient Registry]
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: April 2019

Detailed Description

Hypertension is common and one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Therefore, it is a major societal and economic health problem. A substantial proportion (20-40%) of the treated hypertensive patients has sub-optimal blood pressure control despite the use of multiple drugs. All these patients have an increased cardio-vascular risk. Furthermore, the use of multiple drugs diminishes compliance to treatment, and increases the risk of side effects. This underscores the need for new approaches for hypertension management. Elevated (renal) sympathetic nerve activity contributes importantly to the development of hypertension and subsequent vascular risk. Deliberate disruption of sympathetic nerve activity (sympatholytic therapy) leads to improvement of vascular outcome through blood pressure dependent and blood pressure independent effects. Recently, a promising novel sympatholytic approach has been introduced, i.e. catheter-based renal denervation in a small clinical trial with resistant hypertensive patients. Many clinical centres have now started to perform this procedure or are in the process to start up. The Dutch Minister of Health has decided to allow renal denervation in patients with so called resistant hypertension, and "conditional reimbursement" is available starting Jan 1st 2013 for a maximum of 4 years. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) has provided us with a grant to perform a randomized trial (SYMPATHY) to evaluate the effect on blood pressure at 6 months after intervention. Maximum follow-up in this trial will be 2 years. Important limitations of this study are, firstly that that follow-up is limited to 2 years after renal denervation. Secondly, not all patients that undergo renal denervation, will participate in the abovementioned trial. The Dutch National Renal Denervation Registry will complement the information from the trial in several aspects. These deal with safety, non-responders, and sustainability. Objectives of the national database are to collect data that will deliver information on: Safety: 1. What are the short and long term procedural related complications? Responders 2. What are the predictors for the effect on blood pressure, in particular patient related factors and procedural related factors? 3. Are there differences between the various renal denervation devices? Sustainability 4. What is the effect on blood pressure after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician? 5. What is the effect on kidney function after (3), 6, (9), 12, (18), 24, (30), 36, and 60 months and thereafter in patients who are considered eligible based on the judgement of the treating physician? 6. What are the cardiovascular events rates in this population, in strata of achieved blood pressure level, and potentially compared with other populations. Methods: With this database a nationwide cohort is build comprising patients treated with renal denervation over the years, with uniform baseline data collection and uniform follow-up measurements in terms of safety measurements, blood pressure measurements, hospitalisations, cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. The data collection will occur through a web-based data entry application. All centers in the Netherlands that perform renal denervation will be asked to participate. All patients who underwent renal denervation should be included, irrespective of the reason and device used. To address the outstanding research questions specific statistical analyses plans will be applied. Conclusion: Our expected results are: 1. to be able to identify patients characteristics, which are associated with a high probability of a favourable blood pressure response to renal denervation, 2. to provide short-and long-term (24 -60 months) side effects of renal denervation Perspective: These results, collected in routine clinical practice in a large number of clinics in the Netherlands, will have a major impact on the treatment of 'resistant hypertension'. The safety and efficacy data will pave the way for formal cost-effectiveness analyses. The data have the potential to be of high relevance to decision and policy makers in the government and health insurances. When deemed cost-effective and safe, this approach will be widely used in the treatment of 'resistant hypertension' and will revolutionise the treatment of these patients. Furthermore, it will open ways for evaluation of other groups of patients characterized by a high sympathetic tone; in particular patients with less severe hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Interventions

  • Procedure: Renal denervation
    • Catheter based renal nerve ablation

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Patients treated with renal denervation
    • Patients treated with RD in the Netherlands. The decision to perform RD was made by the treating physician in the participating hospitals.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Change in blood pressure
    • Time Frame: 6 months
    • Change in blood pressure at 6 months

Secondary Measures

  • safety aspects (change in renal function)
    • Time Frame: 5 years
    • change in renal function
  • safety aspects: long term kidney function
    • Time Frame: 5 years
    • change in renal function
  • longterm consequences: CVD events
    • Time Frame: 5 years
    • cardiovascular event rates
  • safety aspects: procedures complication
    • Time Frame: 1 year
    • procedural complications
  • longterm consequences: kidney function
    • Time Frame: 5 years
    • change in kidney function
  • longterm consequences: mortality
    • Time Frame: 5 years
    • mortality

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • treated with renal denervation. The decision to perform the procedure was made by the treating physician in the participating hospitals Exclusion Criteria:

  • below age of 18 years

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 95 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • UMC Utrecht
  • Collaborator
    • Dutch Kidney Foundation
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Michiel L. Bots, Professor of Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease – UMC Utrecht
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Michiel Bots, MD, PhD, m.l.bots@umcutrecht.nl

References

Vink EE, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. Renal denervation as therapy for hypertension: potentials and unanswered questions. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):980-91. doi: 10.1177/2047487312473019. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Citations Reporting on Results

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M, Leiner T. Effects of renal denervation on end organ damage in hypertensive patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 May;22(5):558-67. doi: 10.1177/2047487314556003. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Vink EE, Verloop WL, Bost RB, Voskuil M, Spiering W, Vonken EJ, Bots ML, Blankestijn PJ. The blood pressure-lowering effect of renal denervation is inversely related to kidney function. J Hypertens. 2014 Oct;32(10):2045-53; discussion 2053. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000282.

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Spiering W, Blankestijn PJ, Doevendans PA, Bots ML, Vonken EJ, Voskuil M. Renal denervation in multiple renal arteries. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Aug;44(8):728-35. doi: 10.1111/eci.12289.

Verloop WL, Vink EE, Voskuil M, Vonken EJ, Rookmaaker MB, Bots ML, Doevendans PA, Blankestijn PJ, Spiering W. Eligibility for percutaneous renal denervation: the importance of a systematic screening. J Hypertens. 2013 Aug;31(8):1662-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328362152e.

Persu A, Jin Y, Baelen M, Vink E, Verloop WL, Schmidt B, Blicher MK, Severino F, Wuerzner G, Taylor A, Pechere-Bertschi A, Jokhaji F, Fadl Elmula FE, Rosa J, Czarnecka D, Ehret G, Kahan T, Renkin J, Widimsky J Jr, Jacobs L, Spiering W, Burnier M, Mark PB, Menne J, Olsen MH, Blankestijn PJ, Kjeldsen S, Bots ML, Staessen JA; European Network Coordinating research on REnal Denervation Consortium. Eligibility for renal denervation: experience at 11 European expert centers. Hypertension. 2014 Jun;63(6):1319-25. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03194. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.