Hematoma Block for Distal Radius Fracture

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of ultrasound guided hematoma block versus traditional "blind" hematoma block for analgesia in distal radius fracture reduction.

Full Title of Study: “Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Hematoma Block and “Blind” Hematoma Block for Analgesia in Distal Radius Fractures”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: August 2021

Detailed Description

Hematoma blocks are safe and effective in providing analgesia for fracture reduction1-4. They involve injecting lidocaine directly into the fracture line for analgesia. The physician aspirates blood prior to injection to confirm placement in the hematoma created by the fracture. However, the procedure can be technically difficult if the fracture line is difficult to palpate, for example, due to significant swelling or body habitus. Ultrasound has been shown to improve efficacy in other analgesic procedures such as peripheral nerve blocks5 and also in identifying fracture lines6. There have been case reports and case series which have shown the feasibility and effectiveness of ultrasound guided hematoma blocks for analgesia in patients undergoing reduction for distal radius fractures7,8. To our knowledge there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the use of ultrasound guided hematoma blocks versus traditional hematoma blocks in achieving analgesia for distal radius fracture reduction. In this study, we will determine if ultrasound improves the efficacy of analgesia when performing hematoma blocks for reduction of distal radius fractures.

Interventions

  • Other: ultrasound guide
    • Patients randomized to this arm will have the hematoma block of the distal radial fracture with the guidance of a bedside ultrasound

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: ultrasound-guided hematoma block
    • Patients in this arm will receive a bed-side ultrasound guided hematoma block with analgesia (0.25% bupivacaine)
  • No Intervention: traditional hematoma block
    • Patients in this arm will have the hematoma block of the distal radius fracture with no ultrasound for guidance with analgesia (0.25% bupivacaine)

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Pain Reduction as indicated by Visual Analog Scale
    • Time Frame: 4 hours after initiation of study procedure
    • Subjects will be surveyed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on their pain during 4 points: prior to receiving hematoma block, after receiving hematoma block, during reduction and prior to discharge

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patient ≥ 18 years old presenting to the emergency department with complaint of distal radius fracture Exclusion Criteria:

  • High acuity/distress per the Attending ED physician – Altered mental status or intoxication – Aphasia, mental retardation, dementia, or insurmountable communication barrier – Acute psychiatric illness

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 100 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Collaborator
    • Harvard University
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Beatrice Hoffmann, ED Faculty – Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Beatrice Hoffmann, MD, Principal Investigator, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Beatrice Hoffmann, MD, 617-754-2323, bhoffma2@bidmc.harvard.edu

References

Furia JP, Alioto RJ, Marquardt JD. The efficacy and safety of the hematoma block for fracture reduction in closed, isolated fractures. Orthopedics. 1997 May;20(5):423-6. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19970501-11.

Alioto RJ, Furia JP, Marquardt JD. Hematoma block for ankle fractures: a safe and efficacious technique for manipulations. J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Apr;9(2):113-6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199504000-00004.

Singh GK, Manglik RK, Lakhtakia PK, Singh A. Analgesia for the reduction of Colles fracture. A comparison of hematoma block and intravenous sedation. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1992 Oct 1;Doc No 23:[3614 words; 43 paragraphs].

Johnson PQ, Noffsinger MA. Hematoma block of distal forearm fractures. Is it safe? Orthop Rev. 1991 Nov;20(11):977-9.

Walker KJ, McGrattan K, Aas-Eng K, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub2.

Atkinson P, Lennon R. Use of emergency department ultrasound in the diagnosis and early management of femoral fractures. Emerg Med J. 2003 Jul;20(4):395. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.4.395. No abstract available.

Crystal CS, Miller MA, Young SE. Ultrasound guided hematoma block: a novel use of ultrasound in the traumatized patient. J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):532-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000244398.89188.9c. No abstract available.

Kiely PD, O'Farrell D, Riordan J, Harmon D. The use of ultrasound-guided hematoma blocks in wrist fractures. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Nov;21(7):540-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.01.008. No abstract available.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.