Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

Overview

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 28 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Full Title of Study: “A Phase II, Double-Masked, Randomized, Controlled Study of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: January 2015

Detailed Description

This is a Phase II, multi-center, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension versus vehicle in subjects with dry eye disease. Approximately 400 subjects will be screened and up to 150 subjects will be randomized at up to 12 centers located in the United States. Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 study arms in an approximate 1:1 ratio. The study arms are: 1) KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension administered 1-2 drops in each eye QID for up to 28 days or 2) vehicle administered as 1-2 drops in each eye QID for up to 28 days. This study will include up to 6 clinic visits over 6 weeks. At Visit 1 Screening (14 ± 1 days prior to Day 1), subjects who meet screening inclusion/exclusion criteria will begin a 2-week run-in period during which they will be treated with 1-2 drops of single-masked vehicle in each eye QID for 14 ± 1 days. At Visit 2, Randomization (Day 1), subjects who continue to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible for randomization to 1 of the 2 arms of the study (i.e., KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension or vehicle). Following randomization, subjects will be instructed to return to the clinic to have a complete study evaluation at Study Visits 4 and 6 (Days 15 ± 1 day and 29 ± 1 day, respectively). Subjects will further be instructed to return to the clinic for diary collection and in-clinic symptom assessment only at Visits 3 and 5 (Days 8 ± 1 day and 22 ± 1 day, respectively). The last dose of investigational product and the final study visit will occur upon completion of 28 ± 1 days of exposure to investigational product. Subjects will be released from the study at the end of Visit 6 (Day 29 ± 1 day).

Interventions

  • Drug: KPI-121
    • KPI-121 drug product will be supplied as 0.25% as a suspension in identically packaged opaque dropper bottles. KPI-121 drug product is a sterile, aqueous, submicron suspension of loteprednol etabonate.
  • Drug: Placebo
    • Subjects randomized to placebo control arms will receive the same bottles containing all components at the concentrations used in the KPI-121 drug product with the exception of the active component, loteprednol etabonate.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
    • KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension dosed QID for 28 days in subjects with dry eye disease
  • Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
    • Vehicle (placebo) dosed QID for 28 days in subjects with dry eye disease

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia
    • Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 29)
    • Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
  • Ocular Discomfort
    • Time Frame: Visit 6 (Day 29)
    • Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.

Secondary Measures

  • Corneal Fluorescein Staining Scores
    • Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 15) and Visit 6 (Day 29)
    • Comparison of mean corneal fluorescein staining scores in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using methods developed by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Dry Eye Workshop in evaluating 5 regions of the cornea (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and central) using a 0-3 grading scale, where 0 = no visible staining, 1 = Mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The total score is obtained by summing each of the 5 sections of the cornea. The NEI score will be from 0-15.
  • Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores
    • Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 15)
    • Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia scores in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
  • Ocular Discomfort
    • Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 15)
    • Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

• Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity/contraindication to study product(s) or components. – History of glaucoma, IOP >21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye. – Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; severe/serious systemic disease or uncontrolled medical condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to screening. – In the opinion of Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Gregg Berdy, MD, Principal Investigator, Ophthalmology Associates
    • David Evans, OD, Principal Investigator, Total Eye Care, PA
    • Kathy Kelley, OD, Principal Investigator, Price Vision Group
    • Joseph Martel, MD, Principal Investigator, Martel Eye Medical Group
    • Mark Milner, MD, Principal Investigator, Eye Center of Southern CT, P.C.
    • Steven Rauchman, MD, Principal Investigator, North Valley Eye Medical Group
    • Kenneth Sall, MD, Principal Investigator, Sall Research Medical Center
    • Jeffrey Whitsett, MD, Principal Investigator, Whitsett Vision Group
    • Marc Abrams, MD, Principal Investigator, Abrams Eye Center
    • Michael Korenfeld, MD, Principal Investigator, Ecomprehensive Eye Care, Ltd / Vision Research Institute LLC
    • Jodi Luchs, MD, Principal Investigator, South Shore Eye Center

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.