Closed-Loop Fluid Administration System Using Hemodynamic Monitors

Overview

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a closed-loop (automated) fluid administration system to deliver fluids using feedback from standard operating room hemodynamic monitors. In standard anesthesia care the rate of IV fluid administration to the patient is determined by the anesthesiologist caring for the patient. In this study protocol, the rate of fluid administration will be determined instead by the closed-loop (automated) control system under the supervision of the anesthesiologist. The system will independently decide when to give fluid and at what rate; the supervising anesthesiologist will monitor the system to ensure appropriate volumes are being delivered and to intervene if necessary.

Study Type

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)
• Study Primary Completion Date: May 2014

Detailed Description

In our protocol we will test the hypothesis that closed-loop fluid administration can maintain higher cardiac stroke volume (shown to improve patient outcomes after surgery) than anesthesiologist management. We have shown this to be the case in multiple simulation studies and in-vivo animal studies, but not yet experimentally in a clinical setting. Investigators will recruit their patients from the surgical record that that require cardiac output monitoring undergoing surgery and require mechanical ventilation and consent to participate in the study will be included in the study. They will receive standard patient care in that in no way will their anesthetic or surgical procedure will be altered as part of the study, with the exception of fluid administration. Fluids are usually given to a patient based on the physician's discretion. As part of the study patients will receive fluid management via a closed loop (automated) system that will use an infusion pump (Q-Core) and a controller (a computer run index and algorithm developed by Sironis) to make frequent, regular and accurate adjustments to the amount of fluid the patient receives using feedback from standard operating room monitors at UCI). Data from this study will be retrospectively compared to subjects case matched to evaluate differences in cardiac output, total fluid given, and patient outcomes.

Interventions

• Device: Closed Loop
  • Fluid management in the closed loop group will be performed via a closed loop (automated) system that will use an infusion pump (Q-Core) and a controller (a computer run index and algorithm developed by Sironis) to make frequent, regular and accurate adjustments to the amount of fluid the patient receives using feedback from standard operating room monitors.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

• Experimental: Closed Loop
  • Study patients will receive a baseline crystalloid infusion of 3 cc/kg/hr and all additional fluid management will be performed via a closed loop (automated) system that will determine rate, amount, and timing of fluid administration.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

• Fluid Status During Surgery
  • Time Frame: Duration of Surgery, up to 8 hours
  • The primary outcome between groups is preload independence, defined as % case time where Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) is ≤12%.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult subjects (over the age of 18) – Subjects undergoing elective major, abdominal surgery – Subjects requiring general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation – Subjects requiring cardiac output monitoring and an arterial line Exclusion Criteria:

• Subjects under 18 years of age – Subjects not undergoing surgery – Subjects not requiring general anesthesia or mechanical ventilation – Subjects not requiring cardiac output monitoring or an arterial line – Subjects who are pregnant – Subjects without the capacity to give informed consent

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

• Lead Sponsor
  • University of California, Irvine
• Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
  • Principal Investigator: Maxime Cannesson, Professor – University of California, Irvine
• Overall Official(s)
  • Maxime Cannesson, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, University of California, Irvine

References

Rinehart J, Liu N, Alexander B, Cannesson M. Review article: closed-loop systems in anesthesia: is there a potential for closed-loop fluid management and hemodynamic optimization? Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):130-43. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318230e9e0. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Bednarski P, Siclari F, Voigt A, Demertzis S, Lau G. Use of a computerized closed-loop sodium nitroprusside titration system for antihypertensive treatment after open heart surgery. Crit Care Med. 1990 Oct;18(10):1061-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199010000-00002.

Colvin JR, Kenny GN. Development and evaluation of a dual-pump microcomputer-based closed-loop arterial pressure control system. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1989 Jan;6(1):31-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01723370.

Blankenship HB, Wallace FD, Pacifico AD. Clinical application of closed-loop postoperative autotransfusion. Med Prog Technol. 1990 May;16(1-2):89-93.

Bowman RJ, Westenskow DR. A microcomputer-based fluid infusion system for the resuscitation of burn patients. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981 Jun;28(6):475-9. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1981.324822. No abstract available.

Chaisson NF, Kirschner RA, Deyo DJ, Lopez JA, Prough DS, Kramer GC. Near-infrared spectroscopy-guided closed-loop resuscitation of hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5 Suppl):S183-92. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000064508.11512.28.

DeBey RK, Westenskow DR, Jordan WS, McJames SW. A urine based control system for fluid infusion. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1987;23:195-8. No abstract available.

Rinehart J, Alexander B, Le Manach Y, Hofer C, Tavernier B, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. Evaluation of a novel closed-loop fluid-administration system based on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness: an in silico simulation study. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R278. doi: 10.1186/cc10562. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

Rinehart J, Lee C, Cannesson M, Dumont G. Closed-loop fluid resuscitation: robustness against weight and cardiac contractility variations. Anesth Analg. 2013 Nov;117(5):1110-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182930050.

Rinehart J, Lee C, Canales C, Kong A, Kain Z, Cannesson M. Closed-loop fluid administration compared to anesthesiologist management for hemodynamic optimization and resuscitation during surgery: an in vivo study. Anesth Analg. 2013 Nov;117(5):1119-29. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937d61.

Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R687-93. doi: 10.1186/cc3887. Epub 2005 Nov 8.

Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):910-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eb624f. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

Rinehart J, Chung E, Canales C, Cannesson M. Intraoperative stroke volume optimization using stroke volume, arterial pressure, and heart rate: closed-loop (learning intravenous resuscitator) versus anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):933-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 12.