A periprosthetic distal femur fracture is a fracture close to a knee implant. This type of fracture is often difficult to fix because of the close proximity of the two surgical implants which can sometimes interfere with proper bone healing. Improper healing can cause significant impairment and sometimes requires additional surgeries to correct the problem. Despite considerable interest and research put into developing techniques to repair this fracture surgeons do not know which is the best way to treat this type of fracture.
Our multicentre orthopaedic study group is conducting this study to compare two standard, but different treatments for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. One treatment consists of open surgery and the placement of a plate and screws along the side of the femur. The other consists of implanting an intramedullary nail in the femur.
The goal of this study is to directly compare the two treatments to see if one treatment results in better patient outcomes than the other.
Full Title of Study: “Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Retrograde Nailing”
- Study Type: Interventional
- Study Design
- Allocation: Randomized
- Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
- Study Primary Completion Date: January 2020
- Procedure: Locked Compression Plating
- Procedure: Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing (RIMN)
Arms, Groups and Cohorts
- Experimental: Locked Compression Plating
- A direct lateral approach to the distal femur will be employed utilizing minimally invasive and indirect reduction techniques. After fracture reduction is achieved with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy, a locking plate will be provisionally implanted. Following confirmation of placement, definitive fixation will follow with multiple locking screws in the distal fragment and bicortical screw fixation proximally. A standard layered closure will follow
- Experimental: Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing (RIMN)
- The previous midline knee incision will be employed to access to the knee joint, allowing exposure of the femoral start point via the open box in the femoral component. Following reaming of the canal, an appropriately sized retrograde nail will be inserted. Intra-operative fluoroscopy will be used to confirm reduction. Both proximal and distal locking screws will be used to transfix the nail. A standard layered closure will follow.
Clinical Trial Outcome Measures
- Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
- Time Frame: 3 months
- The TUG is a very simple timed test that was introduced in 1991 to measure mobility in the elderly. It involves documenting the time, in seconds, taken for subjects to rise from a standard arm chair, walk to a line on the floor 3 meters away, turn, return, and sit down again
- Rates of re-operation
- Time Frame: 12 months
Participating in This Clinical Trial
Age 18 years and older Displaced periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur Fracture amenable to both treatment groups, in the opinion of the investigator Knee prosthesis is well-fixed and non-stemmed Open box femoral component Provision of written informed consent
Presence of an active infection around the fracture (soft tissue or bone) Open fracture Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 or any associated major injuries of the lower extremities Medical contraindication to surgery Pregnant women Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up
Gender Eligibility: All
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: N/A
Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No
- Lead Sponsor
- St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto
- Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
- Overall Official(s)
- Aaron Nauth, MD, FRCSC, Principal Investigator, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto
- Emil Schemitsch, MD, FRCSC, Principal Investigator, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto
- Overall Contact(s)
- Milena Vicente, RN, CCRP, 416-864-6060, email@example.com
Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.