Comparison of Long-term Outcomes Following Endoscopic or Open Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Overview

No randomized trials have compared long-term outcomes following endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The investigators conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial between January 1998 and December 2002, including 128 patients (25 to 60 years) with clinically diagnosed and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic CTS. The outcome measures included the validated CTS symptom severity and functional status scales completed at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. The trial showed that the 1-year outcomes of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release regarding symptoms and function were equivalent. This extended follow-up of the randomized trial will primarily measure the symptom outcomes at 10-15 years after surgery. A questionnaire will be sent by mail to the patients. The questionnaire will consist of the CTS symptom severity and functional status scales, the 6-item CTS symptoms scale (CTS-6), the 11-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), the 2-item palmar pain scale, and a visual analog scale about treatment satisfaction. The patients will also be asked about whether they had undergone further surgery for CTS in the same or contralateral hand after their operation in the randomized trial. The completed questionnaires will be scanned into a database. The scores for the different scales will be calculated. Analysis will include comparison between the open and endoscopic groups as well as within-group changes of scores from 1 year to 10-15 years.

Full Title of Study: “Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: 10 to 15 Years Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: November 2014

Interventions

  • Procedure: Endoscopic surgery
    • Surgery dwas done under local anesthesia injected at the portal sites only. Tourniquet was used. Each of the two skin incisions in the endoscopic procedure was 1 cm long. With the endoscope inserted from the distal portal and a hook knife inserted from the proximal portal, the transverse carpal ligament was divided from its distal edge to its proximal edge. Incisions were closed with non-absorbables sutures and a soft dressing was applied. Sutures were removed 10 days postoperatively.
  • Procedure: Open surgery
    • Open carpal tunnel release using conventional open technique under local anesthesia and tourniquet. The incision in the open procedure extended from about 1 cm proximal to 3 cm distal to the wrist crease. The transverse carpal ligament was divided; no additional procedures were performed. a soft dressing was applied. Dressing and sutures were removed 10 days postoperatively.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: Open surgery
    • Open surgery is Open carpal tunnel release
  • Experimental: Endoscopic surgery
    • Endoscopic surgery is 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Change in CTS symptom severity score
    • Time Frame: Baseline to 10-15 years postoperatively

Secondary Measures

  • Rate of repeat surgery
    • Time Frame: 10-15 years postoperatively
  • Change in CTS functional status score
    • Time Frame: from baseline and 1 year to 10-15 years postoperatively
  • Residual pain in the scar or proximal palm
    • Time Frame: 10-15 years postoperatively
  • Patient satisfaction with the results of surgery
    • Time Frame: 10-15 years postoperatively
  • Change in CTS symptom severity score
    • Time Frame: 1 year to 10-15 years postoperatively

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria (original trial):

  • Primary idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome – age 25-60 years – currently employed – duration of symptoms of at least three months – inadequate response to six weeks' treatment with wrist splint – symptoms of classic or probable carpal tunnel syndrome according to the diagnostic criteria in the Katz hand diagram, and nerve conduction test showing median neuropathy at the wrist (distal motor latency ≥4.5 milliseconds, wrist-digit sensory latency ≥3.5 milliseconds, or sensory conduction velocity at the carpal tunnel segment <40 metres/second but no other abnormalities. Exclusion Criteria (original trial): Inflammatory joint disease – diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorder, pregnancy, trauma to the affected hand during the preceding year – previous carpal tunnel release surgery in the affected hand – carpal tunnel release surgery in the contralateral hand during the preceding year – symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome in the contralateral hand not adequately relieved by splint at the time of enrollment – current sick leave because of disorders other than carpal tunnel syndrome – inability to complete questionnaires because of language problem or cognitive disorder.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 25 Years

Maximum Age: 60 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Region Skane
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Isam Atroshi, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden

References

Atroshi I, Larsson GU, Ornstein E, Hofer M, Johnsson R, Ranstam J. Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006 Jun 24;332(7556):1473. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38863.632789.1F. Epub 2006 Jun 15.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.