Randomised Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration

Overview

The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine. During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD. It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions: 1. Does HDF make patients feel better? 2. Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD? 3. Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD? The investigators will do this by randomly assigning patients on HF-HD to receive 2 months of either HF-HD or HDF with as equivalent treatment prescriptions as possible and without the patient knowing which treatment they are receiving. After two months the patients will switch to the alternative form of dialysis for a further two months. During the study the investigators will ask the patients how long it took them to recover from the preceding session of dialysis, assess the frequency of symptomatic low blood pressure and also perform blood tests at set intervals to measure specific blood parameters.

Full Title of Study: “Single Blind, Prospective, Randomised Comparative Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Single (Participant)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: March 2014

Interventions

  • Other: High-flux haemodialysis
    • High-flux haemodialysis is the standard dialysis modality currently in use in the UK
  • Procedure: Haemodiafiltration
    • During Haemodiafiltration, the dialysis machine removes more water from the blood than during “normal” hemodialysis. The additional liquid is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. Thus, the machine exchanges a high volume of fluid during treatment and removes the liquid together with toxins from the blood.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: 8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration
    • 8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis followed by 8 weeks haemodiafiltration
  • Experimental: 8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis
    • 8 weeks haemodiafiltration followed by 8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Change in the average time taken to fully recover post dialysis
    • Time Frame: Baseline compared 8 week treatment point
    • Self-assessment by patient of hours/mins to full recovery after dialysis

Secondary Measures

  • Number of symptomatic hypotension events
    • Time Frame: Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
  • Number of dialysis circuit clotting events
    • Time Frame: Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of potassium
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of phosphate
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of vitamin B12.
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of PTH.
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of beta-2-microglobulin
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of betaine
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of interleukin-6
    • Time Frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period
  • Kt/V urea.
    • Time Frame: : Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Receiving HF-HD for at least 3 months – Reliable vascular access (i.e. use of the same fistula, graft or tunnelled central venous catheter for at least 1 month) – Aged 18 or older Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving HDF – Emergency hospital admissions within the preceding 4 weeks – Life expectancy less than 6 months – Neoplasia – Unable to give informed consent – Unable to perform QoL questionnaire or self report recovery post-dialysis time

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Robert MacTier, Md, FRCP, Study Director, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.