Promoting Patient-Centered Counseling to Reduce Inappropriate Diagnostic Tests

Overview

In this study, the investigators will develop and evaluate a novel intervention using standardized patients (SPs) — or actors playing the roles of patients — to enhance physicians' patient-centered counseling skills regarding two frequently overused, potentially inappropriate services in primary care: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for acute low back pain and bone densitometry in women at low-risk for osteoporosis. The investigators will further evaluate whether intervention effects on physician patient-centeredness generalize to counseling regarding other costly, unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Full Title of Study: “Promoting Patient-Centered Counseling to Reduce Inappropriate Diagnostic Tests: Randomized Clinical Trial”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
    • Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: September 2014

Interventions

  • Behavioral: Standardized Patient Instructor Intervention
    • In each case, patients will harbor underlying concerns about a serious underlying condition (e.g., either disc herniation or osteoporosis) and will request inappropriate tests. Standardized patient instructors (SPIs) will portray new patients visiting the clinic for the first time, and electronic medical records will be identical to that of actual new patients. During the initial part of intervention visits, SPIs will assess the extent to which PCPs engage in patient-centered techniques specified in the final intervention model. SPIs will then break of their role and either teach or reinforce PCP use of the techniques, presenting techniques in a logical sequence while emphasizing flexibility in their use. SPIs will use scripts to deliver the interventions, providing opportunities for PCPs to ask questions, discuss concepts, and practice (by role playing) patient-centered techniques.
  • Behavioral: Control
    • In the latter half of visits with control PCPs, standardized patient instructors will share information with physicians regarding the acute low back pain self-care and bone health, but will not discuss patient-centered techniques or conduct training. The total duration of the control “information sharing” will be about one-third the SPI intervention to enhance patient-centeredness.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Standardized Patient Instructor Intervention
    • Primary care physicians (PCPs) randomized to intervention will receive over a three month run-in period two visits by standardized patient instructors portraying: 1) a 48 year-old patient with low back pain for less than six-weeks and no “red flags” for immediate spinal imaging; and 2) a 50 year-old recently menopausal woman establishing care with concerns about osteoporosis risk.
  • Active Comparator: Control
    • In the latter half of visits with control PCPs, standardized patient instructors (SPIs) will share information regarding low back pain or bone health that are unrelated to diagnostic testing, but will not discuss patient-centered techniques or conduct training. The total duration of the control “information sharing” will be about one-third the SPI intervention to enhance patient-centeredness.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Number of inappropriate diagnostic tests ordered
    • Time Frame: 9 months
    • Investigators will assess via blinded, standardized chart review whether study physicians ordered inappropriate diagnostic tests for unannounced standardized patients who request testing during three follow-up visits occurring 3 to 9 months post-randomization.

Secondary Measures

  • Use of patient-centered counseling techniques
    • Time Frame: 9 months
    • Physician use of patient-centered counseling techniques as assessed via masked recordings of three standardized patient visits
  • Actual diagnostic test ordering among real patients
    • Time Frame: 9 months post-intervention
    • Among real patients seen by study physicians, we will assess diagnostic test ordering among actual adult patients during the post-intervention period. We will also assess comparable diagnostic test ordering during the pre-intervention period to enable adjustment for baseline test ordering.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Resident physician in family medicine or internal medicine who deliver primary care at one of two hospital-based primary care clinics at the University of California, Davis Medical Center Sacramento Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated graduation in less than one year from enrollment.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • University of California, Davis
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Joshua J Fenton, MD, MPH, Principal Investigator, University of California, Davis

References

May L, Franks P, Jerant A, Fenton J. Watchful Waiting Strategy May Reduce Low-Value Diagnostic Testing. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Nov 12;29(6):710-717. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160056.

Citations Reporting on Results

Fenton JJ, Kravitz RL, Jerant A, Paterniti DA, Bang H, Williams D, Epstein RM, Franks P. Promoting Patient-Centered Counseling to Reduce Use of Low-Value Diagnostic Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Feb;176(2):191-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6840.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.