Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator in Assessing Sensory Nerve Block Level of Spinal Anesthesia

Overview

Various methods are used to assess the level of anesthesia block after spinal anesthesia. Among them, ice cubes, alcohol swabs, and needles are commonly used in the clinical setting, but ice is limited by difficulties with management and transportation, and needle assessment has problems owing to the risk of pain, infection, and injury to the patient. Hence, the alcohol swab is commonly used in practice. However, the absence of pain is more important in the surgical process, and assessing the pain block level is more feasible in practice than assessing the sensory nerve block level using the alcohol swab. Therefore, it seems to be better to use the peripheral nerve stimulator for the accurate assessment of the pain block level. This has the advantage of continuous measurement of the block level, which can be used in a practical manner in conjunction with the surgical incision. Hence, the author compared the conventional method using the alcohol swab with the use of the peripheral nerve stimulator to determine which method is more practical in the measurement of spinal anesthesia block level.

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: N/A
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Other
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: May 2020

Interventions

  • Device: the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ + 0-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine
    • The study subjects were patients with planned orthopedic surgery on the infrapatellar area with spinal anesthesia, and 58 patients were recruited sequentially. A blood pressure machine, electrocardiogram, and pulse oximeter were connected to the patient in the operating room, and measurements were carried out every 5 minutes. Prior to the induction of anesthesia, the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ was intravenously administered after the confirmation of intravenous line opening status. For spinal anesthesia, the patient was arranged in the lateral recumbent position, and then the L 3-4 area was disinfected. Depending on the surgical region, height, and weight of each patient, 10-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered through a 25 G needle.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: sensory nerve block level of spinal anesthesia
    • This test group and the control group. Because within the group in two ways to check the level after spinal anesthesia will be.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulator as checking sensory block level after spinal anesthesia
    • Time Frame: Changes of sensory block level at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes after pinal anesthesia
    • The spinal anesthesia block levels were assessed and recorded using the alcohol swab and peripheral nerve stimulation, respectively.

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • The study subjects were adult patients, 20-65 years old, who were going to have orthopedic surgery on the infrapatellar area with spinal anesthesia planned and who fell under the American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classifications of 1 or 2. Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who could not read or understand the consent materials or who had pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, a defect in blood coagulation, cardiovascular disease, or administration of cardiovascular medications were excluded from the study.

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 65 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Yonsei University
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Contact(s)
    • Ki-Young Lee, MD, 02-2227-4224, KYLEE504@yuhs.ac

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.