A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors

Overview

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which affects at least 20% of adult Americans, may be especially common and severe in Veteran patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which block gastric acid production, are the most effective medications for GERD, and the VA spends more than $177 million each year on outpatient PPI prescriptions. PPIs do not prevent the reflux of non-acidic material and do not completely eliminate esophageal acid exposure, however, and bothersome GERD symptoms persist in approximately 40% of patients treated with PPIs. Recent studies using the new technique of esophageal pH/ impedance monitoring, which detects the reflux of both acidic and non-acidic materials, have shown that PPI-resistant GERD symptoms correlate with episodes of reflux (acidic and/or non-acidic) in approximately one-half of patients. For those patients, an antireflux operation might relieve symptoms and obviate the expense of ineffective PPI therapy, but the efficacy of modern, laparoscopic fundoplication in this regard is not clear. For patients with PPI-resistant GERD symptoms, furthermore, the efficacy of medications that that can prevent gastroesophageal reflux (e.g. baclofen) or diminish pain of esophageal origin (e.g. neurotropic agents like desipramine) also is not clear. Study Hypothesis: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (Nissen fundoplication) is superior to medical therapy (PPIs plus baclofen and desipramine) for GERD patients who, while on PPIs, have persistent episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring. Study Goals: The primary goal is to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and medical therapy (PPIs plus baclofen and desipramine) for GERD patients who, while on PPIs, have persistent episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring, and to compare the efficacy of each therapy with placebo. Secondary goals are: 1) To determine the frequency with which non-GERD disorders underlie "PPI failure," 2) To determine the frequency of functional gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression in patients who have persistent heartburn while on PPIs, 3) To determine whether functional gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression is associated with the outcomes of medical and surgical therapies, and 4) To determine whether the outcome of Nissen fundoplication is associated with adherence to technical aspects of the operation. Study Design: Up to 16 VA medical centers, there will be a 30-month recruitment period to enroll 108 patients with heartburn that is refractory to PPI therapy. Patients will have their baseline GERD symptoms scored using the GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) index, and will have endoscopy, esophageal manometry and esophageal pH/impedance monitoring while on PPI therapy. Patients who have episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring will be randomized to one of three treatment groups: Surgical Treatment (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication), Active Medical Treatment (omeprazole and baclofen initially; desipramine for baclofen failures) or Placebo Medical Treatment (omeprazole, placebo baclofen, placebo desipramine). All patients will have quarterly clinic visits for symptom scoring and laboratory testing. At one year, patients will have a final symptom scoring and repeat endoscopy, esophageal manometry and esophageal pH/impedance monitoring. Treatment success will be defined as 50% improvement in the GERD-HRQL score at 12 months. Patients also will complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Rome III Functional GI Disorders Questionnaire and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and one year. The results will be correlated with treatment outcomes.

Full Title of Study: “CSP #573 – A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: December 30, 2016

Interventions

  • Device: Nissen fundoplication
    • laparoscopic antireflux surgery
  • Drug: baclofen
    • Baclofen will be prescribed in a dose of 5 mg three times a day (TID) with meals. The dose of baclofen will be increased by 5 mg TID every week until a total dose of 20 mg TID has been achieved.
  • Drug: Desipramine
    • Dose of 25 mg at bedtime (HS) for 1 week, then 50 mg HS for 1 week, then 100 mg HS until the next quarterly visit.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Other: Medical Treatment Group
    • Omeprazole or Omeprazole + baclofen or Omeprazole + desipramine
  • Other: Surgical Treatment Group
    • Laparoscopic nissen fundoplications
  • Other: Placebo Medical Treatment Group
    • Omeprazole + placebo

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Number of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Improvement in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-related Quality of Life Index (GERD-HRQL) From Baseline to 12 Months
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Success; ≥50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months. Failure; <50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months or: For patients randomized to Surgical Treatment: a.<50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score and/or persistent heartburn of sufficient severity to warrant treatment with any antisecretory medication, antireflux medication or neurotropic medication at any quarterly clinic visit. For patients randomized to Active Medical or Placebo Medical Treatment: a.inability to tolerate both study medications or b.For patients treated with desipramine, i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with the second drug at any quarterly clinic visit. c.For patients in whom desipramine is contraindicated,i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with baclofen or its corresponding placebo at any quarterly clinic visit.

Secondary Measures

  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Esophageal Ulceration.
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Reflux Esophagus.
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Active Ulceration of the Stomach and/or Duodenum.
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Neoplasm of the Esophagus, Stomach or Duodenum
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Candida Esophagitis.
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Gastric Outlet Obstruction
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Achalasia
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Aperistalsis
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Distal Esophageal Spasm
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Nutcracker Esophagus
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Ineffective Esophageal Motility
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Rapid Contraction
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Hypertensive Peristalsis
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Jackhammer Esophagus
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis I
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis II
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Heartburn
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Dysphagia
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Globus
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Belching Disorders
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Vomiting
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Bloating
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Diarrhea
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
    • Time Frame: Screening
  • Number of Successful Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Association between anxiety and/or depression (GAD-7 and PHQ-9) and the outcome of medical and surgical treatments (success or failure) will be evaluated.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Heartburn
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional heartburn as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional chest pain of presumed esophageal origin as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Dysphagia
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional dysphagia as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Globus
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of globus as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Belching Disorders
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of belching disorders as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of chronic idiopathic nausea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Vomiting
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional vomiting as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of cyclic vomiting syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of irritable bowel syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Bloating
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional bloating as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Diarrhea
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional diarrhea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of unspecified functional bowel disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
    • Time Frame: 12 months
    • Presence of functional gallbladder disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Dissection of Distal Esophagus to Obtain at Least 2.5cm of Tension-free, Intra-abdominal Esophagus Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Complete Mobilization of the Fundus, to Include All Short Gastric and Posterior Gastric Vessels to the Base of the Left Crus Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Closure of the Crura With Non-absorbable Suture to be Snug With a Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Passage of an Esophageal Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Between 1.5 and 2.5cm in Length Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Placed Above the Epiphrenic Fat Pad, Using 3 Sutures Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Secured to Esophagus With at Least Two Sutures Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months
  • Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Floppiness Demonstrated by Passing a Grasper Between Fundoplication and Dilator-filled Esophagus Performed.
    • Time Frame: 12 months

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-70 years – History of heartburn (defined as a burning sensation in the retrosternal area of the chest) that is refractory to antisecretory medications – Initial GERD-HRQL: – Total score must be at least 6 and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2 – GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole: – Total score must be >50% of the initial GERD-HRQL score and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2 – Either or both of the following by baseline esophageal pH/multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) monitoring in patients on omeprazole 20 mg two times a day (BID): – Positive symptom association probability (SAP) (>95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux or all reflux. – Abnormal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for at least 4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period) Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have heartburn, defined as a burning sensation in the chest – Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent – Pregnancy or women unwilling to use effective contraception – Age <18 or >70 years – History of surgery on the stomach or esophagus – History of seizure disorder – History of heart block – Allergy to or previous inability to tolerate study medications (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine) – Esophageal varices – Cirrhosis – Co-morbidity of sufficient severity to preclude elective surgery (e.g. pulmonary, cardiac, renal, liver disease) – History of disorders that can cause medically-refractory "GERD symptoms" (eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract, gastroparesis, achalasia) – Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months – History of schizophrenia – Current use of clopidogrel – Patients who have a contraindication to omeprazole or baclofen or who require therapy with a medication that has a clinically important drug interaction with omeprazole or baclofen. – Patients who, in the judgment of the PI, are not suitable candidates for therapy with a study medication (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine) – Initial GERD-HRQL score: Total score <6 and/or all heartburn scores <2 – Inability to tolerate omeprazole during the 2-week treatment phase (before randomization) – GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole: Total score less than or equal to 50% of initial GERD-HRQL score and/or all heartburn scores <2 – Laboratory abnormalities including: – Platelet count <100,000 – international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 (off anticoagulants) – Serum creatinine >2.0 mg per deciliter – Endoscopic abnormalities including: – Los Angeles Classification of Oesophagitis (LA grade) C or D reflux esophagitis – Active ulceration of the esophagus that is not due to reflux esophagitis – Candida esophagitis – Esophageal varices – Active ulceration of the stomach and/or duodenum – Neoplasm of the esophagus, stomach or duodenum – Gastric outlet obstruction – Eosinophilic esophagitis at least (15 eosinophils per high power field in any esophageal biopsy specimen) – Manometric abnormalities including: – Achalasia – Complete aperistalsis – Negative SAP ( 95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux and all reflux on baseline combined esophageal pH/MII monitoring and normal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for <4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period) – Study surgeon identifies a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication – Morbid obesity (BMI at least 40) – Large paraesophageal hernia

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 64 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • VA Office of Research and Development
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Stuart J Spechler, MD, Study Chair, VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.