Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Procaterol Versus Salbutamol Given Via Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in the Management of Acute Asthma Attack in the Emergency Room

Overview

To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled procaterol (Meptin Air) versus inhaled salbutamol as metered dose inhaler (MDI) reliever of acute exacerbation of asthma not in imminent respiratory failure.

Full Title of Study: “Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Procaterol vs Salbutamol Given Via Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in the Management of Acute Asthma Attack in the Emergency Room”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: September 2009

Interventions

  • Drug: Procaterol
    • Procaterol(Meptin Air) MDI, 20 ug or 2 puffs every 20 minutes + Hydrocortisone, 100 mg IV shall be given immediately at start of treatment
  • Drug: Salbutamol
    • Salbutamol(Ventolin Inhaler) MDI, 40 ug or 4 puffs every 20 minutes + Hydrocortisone, 100 mg IV shall be given immediately at start of treatment

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Procaterol
    • Procaterol(Meptin Air) MDI, 20 ug or 2 puffs every 20 minutes + Hydrocortisone, 100 mg IV shall be given immediately at start of treatment
  • Active Comparator: Salbutamol
    • Salbutamol(Ventolin Inhaler) MDI, 40 ug or 4 puffs every 20 minutes + Hydrocortisone, 100 mg IV shall be given immediately at start of treatment

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • To evaluate the bronchodilator efficacy of inhaled procaterol (Meptin Air) vs. inhaled salbutamol used as MDI reliever of acute exacerbation of asthma in the ER.
    • Time Frame: < 12 hours

Secondary Measures

  • To evaluate the safety of procaterol MDI (Meptin Air) versus salbutamol MDI in the management of acute exacerbation of asthma in terms of adverse side effects such as palpitations, tachycardia, tremor, and hypokalemia.
    • Time Frame: < 12 hours

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients aged 20 years old and above who are brought to the Emergency Room (ER) with acute bronchospasm – Diagnosed cases of bronchial asthma based on history, physical examination and pulmonary function test – Patients maintained on inhaled steroids who have no active medical problems (such as pulmonary TB, cardiac and renal diseases) aside from asthma – Presence of known risk factors for asthma mortality does not disqualify patients from the study unless they are in impending respiratory failure – All patients must sign the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are in respiratory distress consistent with severe exacerbation requiring intensive care hospital admission – Who had intake of oral bronchodilator 6 hrs prior to consult – Who had intake of oral steroids within the last 24 hrs – Those with positive history of allergy and hypersensitivity to procaterol and salbutamol – Patients who are diagnosed or clinically suspected to have COPD (ever-smokers with >10 pack-years smoking history or those exposed to workplaces where there is a heavy smoke load) – Presence of concurrent disease/diseases that may aggravate asthma thereby delaying bronchodilator response (e.g., pneumonia, pulmonary congestion and others) – Patients with other medical conditions which are serious enough to warrant immediate concurrent therapy during the 1 hour study and/or whose condition can be adversely affected by the treatment given (like uncontrolled diabetes, renal failure and hepatic insufficiency) – The NIH Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy has recommended that pregnant asthmatics are treated as aggressively as non-pregnant patients particularly during acute asthmatic attack. , Bronchodilators (except for epinephrine which is not in this study) have been found safe in pregnancy with a risk class of B and C. For these reasons, pregnancy by itself is not an exclusion criterion in this study and a pregnancy test will not be required for those who are in the childbearing age group. Requiring the test will unnecessarily delay the treatment for acute asthma. However, those who are suspected to be suffering from pregnancy-related complications like vaginal bleeding, premature labor, pre-eclampsia and others, are excluded. – Severe Acute Asthma Attack, a reason for patient exclusion, shall be defined in this study as the presence of any one of the following criteria: 1. Severe asthma with a lack of response to initial therapy in the emergency department or worsening asthma despite adequate therapy. 2. Presence of confusion, drowsiness, other signs of impending respiratory arrest, or loss of consciousness 3. Wood-Downe's clinical asthma scoring score of >5 (see table 2 below) – Any patient who is currently participating in other drug trials and/or having participated in other drug trials for less than 1 month of termination of the trial are excluded – Patients who have previously participated in this study are excluded

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 20 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Inc., Philippines
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Dr. Camilo Roa, MD / Study Principal Investigator, Philippine General Hospital
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Camilo Roa, MD, Principal Investigator, Philippine General Hospital

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.