Medication Histories Conducted by Nurses (RNs), Pharmacy Techs (CPhTs) & Pharmacists (RPhs)

Overview

Up to 50% of medication errors and 20% of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the hospital setting are estimated to be related to communication issues regarding patient medications at various transition points of care from admission to discharge. The Joint Commission (TJC) requires accurate and complete medication reconciliation occur at each transition point throughout hospitalization. Evidence from NQF demonstrates pharmacists (RPh) are the most effective medication management team leaders in the implementation of medication management practices and design of medication error reduction strategies; medication reconciliation is one of the five safety objectives pharmacists are recommended to lead. In addition, the Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors states strong evidence supports the use of pharmacy technicians (CPhT) in conjunction with pharmacists in completing accurate medication histories. WMC nurses (RN) currently are involved in the medication reconciliation process. In 2009, a Medication Use Evaluation (MUE) of Medication Reconciliation Accuracy found a 67% medication error rate on admission determined by comparing the nurse-obtained medication history to the pharmacist-obtained medication history. The number of home medications identified by the pharmacist compared to the nurse was 411 versus 312 (p<0.0001). The total percentage of medication errors prevented by the pharmacist was 66.2. Using the VA Healthcare Failure Mode Effects Analysis – HFMEA™ Hazard Scoring Matrix, 3 independent pharmacist reviewers found that 18% of patients interviewed had a score greater than 7, and 3 patients had a score of 12 (major/probable), if the discrepancies would not have been identified and corrected by the pharmacist conducting the admission medication reconciliation audit. The same patients' discharge medication reconciliation and discharge medication lists were retrospectively reviewed for the MUE, and the total percentage of patients with medication errors on discharge was 43%.

Full Title of Study: “Electronic Patient Triage Development and Implementation Involving Nurse (RN), Pharmacy Technician (CPhT), and Pharmacist (RPh) Obtained Medication Histories in the Emergency Department (ED)and Impact on Medication Reconciliation”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: N/A
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
    • Masking: Single (Care Provider)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: April 2010

Interventions

  • Other: Medication reconciliation completed by a RN, CPhT, or RPh
    • To determine which patients benefit the most from medication histories obtained by the RN, CPhT, or RPh. Patients will be admitted as inpatients through the ED with medication histories finalized electronically by the RN at the admitting unit.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • To determine which patients benefit most from medication histories obtained by the RN, CPhT, or RPh based on accuracy (% complete disease states, allergy documentation and description, vaccination documentation, medication documentation)
    • Time Frame: 5 months

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients admitted as inpatients from the Emergency Department Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prisoners (because the IRB does not have a prisoner representative) – Patients not admitted as inpatients through the Emergency Department – Patients admitted more than once during the study period

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Wesley Medical Center
  • Collaborator
    • Cardinal Health
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Joan Kramer, Clinical Research Pharmacist – Wesley Medical Center
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Joan S Kramer, PharmD, Principal Investigator, Wesley Medical Center

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.