Comparison of Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid With Oral Cephalexin for the Treatment of Cellulitis

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral cephalexin is equivalent to intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in patients that present to the emergency department.

Full Title of Study: “Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid vs. Oral Cephalexin for the Treatment of Cellulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: October 2014

Detailed Description

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common reason for presentation to an Emergency Department (ED) in Canada. Although many patients with mild SSTI are able to be managed at home with oral antibiotics, those with mild-moderate infections are often treated with parenteral antibiotics. Current practice patterns in Canadian EDs indicate this patient population is often treated with intravenous cefazolin once daily along with oral probenecid and return to the ED or other ambulatory setting for daily medication administration and assessment. This parenteral regimen has been found to result in success rates comparable to studies which have evaluated treatment success with oral antibiotics in this patient population (89-97%). Although successful outcome can be achieved with this approach, it is often inconvenient for the patient to return to the ED/ambulatory care unit daily and does contribute to overall ED/ambulatory care visit volumes and overall health care costs. Unfortunately, there has never been a study which has evaluated the relative efficacy and safety or oral antibiotics to the aforementioned parenteral approach in this patient population and thus there remains a significant knowledge gap which must be addressed before a change in current practice can be explored. The objective of the study is to determine whether oral cephalexin is equivalent to intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated SSTIs in patients that present to the ED. This study will be a prospective, multi-centered, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing cephalexin 500 mg orally four times to cefazolin 2 g IV plus probenecid 1 g orally, in patients presenting to the ED with presumed diagnosis of SSTI. The primary outcome will be to compare the proportion of patients failing therapy for their cellulitis after 72 hours of antibiotic treatment with oral cephalexin or IV cefazolin/oral probenecid 1 g daily. Secondary outcomes include the clinical cure rate at 7 days, percentage of patients requiring hospital admission, percentage of patients stepped down to oral antibiotics on or before day 7 of therapy, percentage of patients requiring an additional antibiotic prescription on day 7, and the frequency of adverse events.

Interventions

  • Drug: IV cefazolin plus oral probenecid and placebo cephalexin
    • Intravenous cefazolin 2 g IV plus probenecid 1 g daily plus cephalexin placebo orally four times daily.
  • Drug: Oral cephalexin and saline IV plus probenecid placebo
    • Cephalexin 500 mg orally four times daily plus saline IV and oral probenecid placebo daily

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Active Comparator: IV cefazolin plus oral probenecid and placebo cephalexin
  • Active Comparator: Oral cephalexin and saline IV plus probenecid placebo

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • The Number of Patients Failing Therapy After 72 Hours of Antibiotic Treatment With Oral Cephalexin or Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid.
    • Time Frame: 72 hours

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting to the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of mild to moderate skin and soft tissue infection – Deemed well enough to be treated as an outpatient – 19 years of age or older Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to study drugs – known chronic kidney disease with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min – known previous methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection – use of antibiotics for greater than 24 hours in the past 7 days – wound/abscess requiring operative debridement or incision and drainage – suspected necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis or septic arthritis – febrile neutropenia – concomitant documented bacteremia – Two or more signs of systemic sepsis – new altered mental status – infections at a site involving prosthetic materials – animal or human bite wound infections – post-operative wound infections – known peripheral vascular disease – superficial thrombophlebitis – pregnant/breastfeeding – obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 19 Years

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Kelowna General Hospital
  • Collaborator
    • Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Dawn Dalen, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Emergency Medicine – Kelowna General Hospital
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Dawn Dalen, PharmD, Principal Investigator, Interior Health
    • Peter Zed, PharmD, Principal Investigator, Capital Health, Canada

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.