Effects of GABA-a-Agonists on Pain Mechanisms: An Experimental Study in Healthy Volunteers

Overview

The investigators will use an intradermal capsaicin injection in the forearm to induce a state of localized pain. This localized pain will be measured by different means, and analysed locally and distally by so called quantitative sensory testing. The primary endpoint of measure is the difference in pain perception with and without benzodiazepines/GABA-Agonists around the injection point of capsaicin. The secondary endpoints are to measure pain modulation locally and distally by different quantitative tests as electricity, pressure pain thresholds, and ice water tests. The investigators' hypothesis is that clobazam induces higher pain thresholds as placebo and less sedation than the control medication clonazepam.

Full Title of Study: “Effects of Gaba-a-Agonists on Pain Mechanisms: An Experimental Study in Healthy Volunteers”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: April 2010

Detailed Description

Background Neuropathic and nociceptive pain are linked to plastic changes of the central nervous system. These lead to lower pain thresholds. An important component of this neuronal plasticity is a diminished inhibition-control of the neurons on the level of the spine, where an alpha-3 subunit of the glycine receptor plays an important role. Modulation of this receptor subunit with specific and non-specific GABA-Agonists produce antinociception. The new fact is, that a subunit specific medication does not induce sedation in animals. The relationship of pain modulation and Gaba-Agonists is not well studied in humans. The benzodiazepine used in pain therapy in humans is clonazepam, which induces a strong sedation, reason why it is not much used in a chronic pain setting. Clobazam is another GABA-Agonist, which is less sedative. To our knowledge its effects on pain modulation has never been studied in humans. Objective The aim is an analysis and description of clobazam on the central pain mechanisms. We will use well known quantitative sensory testing methods therefore. The primary objective is to gather data about potential clinical use of clobazam in pain therapy. The secondary aim would be to do the same tests on new specific alpha-3 agonists, which are being developed by pharmaceutical industry. Methods Quantitative sensory testing is being made after eliciting an area of hyperalgesia on the forearm by capsaicin. The area of hyperalgesia around the injection point will be the primary issue of this study. The medication given to our patients will be a cross-over, double blind randomized administration of clobazam, clonazepam (positive control) and tolterodine (active placebo). Quantitative sensory testing will be made before and after study medication administration. The quantitative sensory testing consists of the area of hyperalgesia around capsaicin injection point, pressure pain elicited with an electronic pressure algometer, ice-water testing of the hand, single and multiple electrical skin and muscle stimulation, pressure-cuff algometry and the side effects of the administered medication with psychomotor testing. Before we start the study protocol each patient will have a blood sample drawn for genetic testing of the different cytochrome subunits (CYP P450 2C19, 3A4).

Interventions

  • Drug: clobazam
    • test substance
  • Drug: clonazepam
    • positive control
  • Drug: tolterodine
    • active placebo

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Other: 1
  • Other: 2
  • Other: 3

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • area of hyperalgesia on the forearm
    • Time Frame: 11.2010

Secondary Measures

  • Diffuse noxious inhibition control
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • Pressure cuff algometry
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • pressure pain
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • electrical stimulation-temporal summation
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • psychomotor testing
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • Pharmacokinetic study: plasmatic concentration measured in regular intervals with blood samples, starting at time zero and ending at time plus 24h after drug administration.
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • Pharmacodynamic study: Measurement of pharmacodynamic behaviour of our 3 tested substances in relation to sedation score.
    • Time Frame: 11.2010
  • Pharmacogenetic study: Measurement of subtype cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 by metabolites of midazolam and omeprazol. Genotyping of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 and CYP 2C19.
    • Time Frame: 11.2010

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • European males – 18-55 years old – non smoking status or less than 10 cigarettes per day – no disease Exclusion Criteria – any medication – any drug abuse – diseases of any type

Gender Eligibility: Male

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 55 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Dr. med. Pascal Vuilleumier, Inselspital Bern, Institut für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Michele Curatolo, Professor, Study Director, University of Bern
    • Pascal H Vuilleumier, Dr med, Principal Investigator, University of Bern

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.