In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of Antimalarial Treatments in Children in Burkina Faso

Overview

Resistance to antimalarial drugs represents a major obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries, so that most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to the new Artemisinin Containing Therapies. Burkina Faso has changed its policy for uncomplicated malaria to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS), but there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; both treatments have shown to be efficacious, but AL seems to have higher occurrence of recurrent malaria infections during a 28-day follow up period. Thus, this study aims at comparing the safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up), AND also at comparing their in vitro sensitivity, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.

Full Title of Study: “In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of the Recommended First Line Antimalarial Treatments (Artemether-Lumefantrine and Amodiaquine-Artesunate) in Children With Uncomplicated Malaria in Burkina Faso”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: October 2010

Detailed Description

Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drugs represents the major drawback and obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries; that's why most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to Artemisinin Containing Therapies (ACT), which produce a rapid clinical and parasitological cure, reduce gametocyte carriage rate and are generally well tolerated. Burkina Faso has recently changed its policy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, from Chloroquine to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS). However, there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; a recent study carried out in Bobo Dioulasso showed that both treatments were extremely efficacious (adjusted treatment failure less than 5%) but with AL showing significantly high occurrence of recurrent infections during the 28-day follow up period. The higher risk for recurrent infections for AL was confirmed in a subsequent trial comparing AL with AQ-SP and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, but so far no direct comparison between AQ+AS and AL has been completed, though a study in Nanoro, near Ouagadougou, is ongoing. Thus, the present study aims at comparing the in vivo safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up),AND at comparing the in vitro sensitivity of the different ACT components, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.

Interventions

  • Drug: Artesunate-amodiaquine
    • Coformulated AQ+AS by Sanofi-Aventis has been pre-qualified by WHO in 2008. It is administered once daily for three consecutive days, and it is available in three different dosages (25mg/67.5mg; 50mg/135mg; 100mg/270mg)
  • Drug: Artemether-lumefantrine
    • Artemether-lumefantrine by Novartis was the first fixed-dose ACT that was prequalified by WHO in April 2004. A 3-day, 6-dose regimen of AL is recommended for infants and children weighing 5-35 kg and adults weighing > 35 kg.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Artemether -lumefantrine
    • Treatment of malaria with Artemether-lumefantrine (AL), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso
  • Experimental: Artesunate-amodiaquine
    • Treatment of malaria with Artesunate-amodiaquine(AS-AQ), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • PCR unadjusted treatment failure (regardless of genotyping).
    • Time Frame: 42 days

Secondary Measures

  • PCR adjusted treatment failure
    • Time Frame: 42 days
  • PCR unadjusted treatment failure
    • Time Frame: 28 days
  • PCR adjusted treatment failure
    • Time Frame: 28 days
  • Fever clearance time
    • Time Frame: day 1, 2, 3
  • Asexual parasite clearance time
    • Time Frame: day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
  • Gametocytaemia (prevalence and density)
    • Time Frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42
  • Safety profiles of the two treatments
    • Time Frame: 42 days overall
  • Parasites in vitro sensitivity to the drugs tested and their relationship with the in vivo results
    • Time Frame: before treatment and at the day of reccurrente parasitemia

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 6 – 59 months – Weight > 5 kg – Mono-infection with P. falciparum – Parasitemia of 4,000-200,000 asexual parasites per µl – Fever: > 37.5 °C or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours – Haemoglobin > 5.0 g/dl – Signed informed consent by the parents or guardians – Parents' or guardians' willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the trial. Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in any other clinical trial during the previous 30 days – Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs – Severe and/or complicated malaria (cases will be referred to Bobo-Dioulasso University hospital for treatment) – Danger signs: not able to drink or breast-feed, vomiting (> twice in 24hours), recent history of convulsions (>1 in 24h), unconscious state, unable to sit or stand; – Known intercurrent illness or any condition which would place the subject at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study. – Severe malnutrition (weight for height <70% of the median NCHS/WHO reference)

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 6 Months

Maximum Age: 15 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Centre Muraz
  • Collaborator
    • Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Principal Investigator: Tinto Halidou, PharmD, PhD – Centre Muraz
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Halidou Tinto, PhD, Principal Investigator, Centre Muraz

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.