Protein Nutrition During Weight Loss

Overview

The purpose of this study is to minimize the loss of lean body mass that occurs during a weight-loss program in obese people by changing the nature of ingested protein and the pattern of protein feeding

Full Title of Study: “Effect of Milk Proteins and Protein Feeding Pattern on Body Composition and Protein Metabolism in Energy Restricted Obese Subjects”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
    • Masking: None (Open Label)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: July 2010

Detailed Description

In most physiological situations, the adequate amount of protein necessary to promote health is more and more well known. However, for an adequate protein intake, it was shown that the kinetic of amino acid delivery to the organism has an influence on the efficiency of protein utilization. In particular, caseins, slowly digested milk proteins, promote a better protein balance than rapidly digested milk soluble proteins in young subjects (Boirie et al., 1997). In addition, changing protein feeding pattern (80% of daily protein consumed at noon vs 25%) significantly affect protein balance (Arnal et al., 2000). In young healthy individuals, the best protein efficiency is obtained by spreading protein absorption over time (casein, and/or 4 isoproteic meal per day). On the contrary, in older individuals, due to alteration in the sensitivity of protein metabolism to feeding, it is better to use rapidly digested proteins (Dangin et al., 2003), and / or to have a protein-rich meal once a day (Arnal et al., 1999). Another physiological situation that was not studied in this regard is obesity. Obesity incidence is rapidly increasing around the world. When body mass index (weight / height2) becomes too high (>30), it is often suggested to restrict energy intake. However, severe energy restriction leads to fat mass loss, but also to lean body mass loss, which should be prevented. Our aim is to test whether for an adequate amount of total protein, it is possible to preserve lean body mass by using either casein, or milk soluble proteins, or by changing protein feeding pattern.

Interventions

  • Dietary Supplement: Pulse casein feeding during energy restriction
    • Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being casein. In addition, a pulse protein feeding pattern is used (8% protein in the morning, 80% for lunch, 4% at 1600 h and 8% in the evening).
  • Dietary Supplement: Spread casein feeding during energy restriction
    • Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being casein. In addition, a spread protein feeding pattern is used (25% of protein at each of the four meals of the day).
  • Dietary Supplement: Pulse milk soluble protein feeding during energy restriction
    • Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being milk soluble proteins. In addition, a pulse protein feeding pattern is used (8% protein in the morning, 80% for lunch, 4% at 1600 h and 8% in the evening).
  • Dietary Supplement: Spread milk soluble protein feeding during energy restriction
    • Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being milk soluble proteins. In addition, a spread protein feeding pattern is used (25% of protein at each of the four meals of the day).

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Casein Pulse
    • casein is the main protein consumed, it is given during 6 weeks with a “pulse” protein feeding pattern : 8% for breakfast, 80% for lunch, 4% around 1600h, and 8% for dinner.
  • Experimental: Casein Spread
    • casein is the main protein consumed, it is given during 6 weeks with a “spread” protein feeding pattern : 25% for breakfast, 25% for lunch, 25% around 1600h, and 25% for dinner.
  • Experimental: MSP Pulse
    • Milk soluble proteins (MSP) are the main protein consumed, it is given during 6 weeks with a “pulse” protein feeding pattern : 8% for breakfast, 80% for lunch, 4% around 1600h, and 8% for dinner.
  • Experimental: MSP Spread
    • Milk soluble proteins (MSP) are the main protein consumed, it is given during 6 weeks with a “spread” protein feeding pattern : 25% for breakfast, 25% for lunch, 25% around 1600h, and 25% for dinner.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Lean body mass
    • Time Frame: 6 weeks

Secondary Measures

  • Nitrogen balance
    • Time Frame: 6 weeks
  • whole body leucine turnover
    • Time Frame: 6 weeks

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • BMI>30 – sedentary – normal TSH Exclusion Criteria:

  • any serious health problem

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 40 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
  • Collaborator
    • Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’Auvergne
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Michel Beckert, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Yves Boirie, MD, Ph D, Professor, Principal Investigator, Université d’Auvergne, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

References

Arnal MA, Mosoni L, Boirie Y, Houlier ML, Morin L, Verdier E, Ritz P, Antoine JM, Prugnaud J, Beaufrere B, Mirand PP. Protein pulse feeding improves protein retention in elderly women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Jun;69(6):1202-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1202.

Arnal MA, Mosoni L, Boirie Y, Houlier ML, Morin L, Verdier E, Ritz P, Antoine JM, Prugnaud J, Beaufrere B, Mirand PP. Protein feeding pattern does not affect protein retention in young women. J Nutr. 2000 Jul;130(7):1700-4. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.7.1700.

Boirie Y, Dangin M, Gachon P, Vasson MP, Maubois JL, Beaufrere B. Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14930-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14930.

Dangin M, Guillet C, Garcia-Rodenas C, Gachon P, Bouteloup-Demange C, Reiffers-Magnani K, Fauquant J, Ballevre O, Beaufrere B. The rate of protein digestion affects protein gain differently during aging in humans. J Physiol. 2003 Jun 1;549(Pt 2):635-44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.036897. Epub 2003 Mar 28.

Dardevet D, Sornet C, Bayle G, Prugnaud J, Pouyet C, Grizard J. Postprandial stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in old rats can be restored by a leucine-supplemented meal. J Nutr. 2002 Jan;132(1):95-100. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.1.95.

Lacroix M, Bos C, Leonil J, Airinei G, Luengo C, Dare S, Benamouzig R, Fouillet H, Fauquant J, Tome D, Gaudichon C. Compared with casein or total milk protein, digestion of milk soluble proteins is too rapid to sustain the anabolic postprandial amino acid requirement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Nov;84(5):1070-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1070.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.