Topical Steroid Treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Overview

This was a randomized controlled trial of swallowed fluticasone vs. placebo for eosinophilic esophagitis. Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which the wall of the esophagus becomes filled with large numbers of eosinophils, a type of white blood cell. Patients who have this condition have difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia) solid food. Prior to treatment the patients had biopsies of their esophagus and took questionnaires regarding their symptoms. Treatment was given for 6 weeks, after which biopsies were taken from the esophagus to measure any changes in the tissue from before treatment. The primary endpoint was improvement in dysphagia as measured by the validated Mayo Dysphagia Questionaire. Secondary outcomes included partial symptom response, and histologic (tissue) response to treatment.

Full Title of Study: “A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Swallowed Fluticasone in Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Allocation: Randomized
    • Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    • Primary Purpose: Treatment
    • Masking: Double (Participant, Care Provider)
  • Study Primary Completion Date: April 2010

Detailed Description

This was a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effect of aerosolized fluticasone therapy on symptomatic dysphagia and histologic eosinophilia in adults newly diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Participants were randomized to receive aerosolized swallowed fluticasone 880 mcg bid or placebo inhaler swallowed bid for 6 weeks. Four mid esophageal biopsies were obtained from 10 cm above the squamo-columnar junction; then formalin-fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All esophageal biopsies were read and scored by a single expert gastrointestinal pathologist. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded esophageal biopsies were retrieved and underwent standard major basic protein (MBP) immunofluorescence staining. All special stain slides were then read and scored by another pathologist. 24-hour urine was collected for free cortisol by the standard technique. The original endoscopy was performed before the patient was enrolled in the trial by standard clinical technique. The endoscopy post treatment was done in the clinical research unit by the principal investigator. Patients kept compliance logs that were reviewed at phone interviews at 2 and 4 weeks time and at the end of study evaluation. Ninety percent compliance was required for study inclusion. At the end of 6 weeks, a 24-hour urine cortisol was done, and patients underwent a repeat endoscopy while still on treatment. Mid-esophageal biopsies were obtained and evaluated for eosinophil density and mast cell degranulation. At this visit the patients returned dysphagia and side effects questionnaires.

Interventions

  • Drug: Fluticasone
    • Aerosolized swallowed fluticasone 880 mg twice a day
  • Drug: Placebo
    • Placebo inhaler swallowed twice a day for 6 weeks

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: Fluticasone
    • Aerosolized swallowed fluticasone 880 mcg bid for 6 weeks
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    • Placebo inhaler swallowed bid for 6 weeks

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Number of Participants With Complete Response to Dysphagia
    • Time Frame: 2 weeks
    • Measured by the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire, a validated 28 item instrument; 0=no dysphagia, higher levels indicate greater dysphagia severity. A complete symptom response was defined as an answer of “no” to the question “In the past 2 weeks, have you had trouble swallowing, not associated with other cold symptoms (such as strep throat or mono)?”

Secondary Measures

  • Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response to Dysphagia
    • Time Frame: 2 weeks
    • Measured by the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire, a validated 28 item instrument; 0=no dysphagia, higher levels indicate greater dysphagia severity. A complete symptom response was defined as an answer of “no” to the question “In the past 2 weeks, have you had trouble swallowing, not associated with other cold symptoms (such as strep throat or mono)?” A partial symptom response was defined as an answer of yes to the above question and a decrease in severity of at least 2 levels, or a decrease in frequency of at least 1 level.
  • Number of Participants With Complete Histologic Response
    • Time Frame: 2 weeks
    • A complete histologic response was defined as >90% decrease in mean eosinophil count/high powered field

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • > 20 eosinophils / hpf on biopsies from mid esophagus (hpf = high-powered field) – Abnormal dysphagia questionnaire (question 1a "yes", question 1c > "moderate" and question 2 > "less than once a week") on Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire. Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical evidence of infectious process potentially contributing to dysphagia (e.g., candidiasis, cytomegalovirus, herpes) – Systemic or topical steroid therapy for any reason over the past 3 months – Previous steroid treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis – Intolerance to steroid therapy in the past – Other cause of dysphagia identified at endoscopy (e.g., reflux esophagitis, stricture, web, ring, achalasia, esophageal neoplasm) – Dilatation of esophagus at time of index endoscopy

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: 18 Years

Maximum Age: 60 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Mayo Clinic
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Jeffrey A. Alexander, M.D, Mayo Clinic
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Jeffrey A. Alexander, M.D., Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic

References

McElhiney J, Lohse MR, Arora AS, Peloquin JM, Geno DM, Kuntz MM, Enders FB, Fredericksen M, Abdalla AA, Khan Y, Talley NJ, Diehl NN, Beebe TJ, Harris AM, Farrugia G, Graner DE, Murray JA, Locke GR 3rd, Grothe RM, Crowell MD, Francis DL, Grudell AM, Dabade T, Ramirez A, Alkhatib M, Alexander JA, Kimber J, Prasad G, Zinsmeister AR, Romero Y. The Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30: documentation of reliability and validity of a tool for interventional trials in adults with esophageal disease. Dysphagia. 2010 Sep;25(3):221-30. doi: 10.1007/s00455-009-9246-8. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.