Home or Home-like Hospital Birth

Overview

In the Netherlands, which has about 200.000 births per year, maternity care is provided by midwives or general practitioners unless medical reasons necessitate specialist obstetric care. Women with low risk pregnancies are free to decide where to give birth, attended by their midwife or general practitioner, at home or in the hospital, from which they are then discharged within 24 hours. In the Netherlands these hospital births are referred to as "poliklinische bevallingen" (i.e. outpatient deliveries) to indicate that they do not involve formal hospitalisation, or as "verplaatste thuisbevalling" (i.e. relocated home births) to indicate that they are supervised by the same caregivers as the home births without involvement of specialist obstetricians. In the last two decades a marked increase in the referral rate to obstetricians during childbirth has occurred, especially for nulliparae, both in planned home births and planned hospital births (outpatient deliveries). 90% from all primigravidae will start their pregnancy under care of the primary caregiver (midwife of general practitioner). During the pregnancy 30% will be referred to the secondary caregiver (obstetrician specialist). The other 60% will start labor guided by the primary caregiver. More than 50% of these women will be referred to the obstetrician during labor. Despite this unique situation of the Dutch maternity care, the differences between home and hospital birth (outpatient deliveries) with regard to effectivity and efficiency have never been investigated. It is also unclear if pregnant women are informed about a 50% risk of being transported to the secondary caregiver/ hospital during labor at home. Neither do we know what their experiences are. This study aims to investigate the differences between home and hospital deliveries under care of the primary caregiver with regard to effectivity (costs) and efficiency (patient satisfaction) of care.

Full Title of Study: “Home or Home-like Hospital Birth for Low-risk Nulliparae: Does it Matter?”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: March 2008

Interventions

  • Other: obstetric care

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • 1
    • Women with the intention to give birth at home
  • 2
    • Women with the intention to give birth in a short-stay hospital setting

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • primary outcome: referral rate to secondary care, preferences of women and partners with regard to place of birth. Secondary outcome: costs of home birth and hospital births satisfaction of obstetric care

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • Primiparae – No medical indication for specialistic care – The pregnant woman will be able to give birth at home or at a hospital – The woman and her partner will be fluent in the Dutch language

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • Collaborator
    • School for Midwifery Maastricht
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Jan G. Nijhuis, Prof MD PhD, Maastricht University Medical Centre
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Jan G. Nijhuis, Prof dr MD PhD, Study Chair, Maastricht University Medical Center
    • Marijke JC Hendrix, MBA, Principal Investigator, Maastricht University Medical Center

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.