To Determine if Olanzapine is More Cost Effective Than Haloperidol for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Overview

Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal.

Full Title of Study: “CSP #451 – The Clinical and Economic Impact of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Interventional
  • Study Design
    • Masking: Double
  • Study Primary Completion Date: June 2001

Detailed Description

Primary Hypothesis: To determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia. Secondary Hypothesis: Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol. Intervention: Olanzapine (5 mg to 20 mg/day), haloperidol (5 mg to 20 mg/day). Primary Outcomes: Total inpatient hospital care costs are the primary outcome. Other major outcomes are total social costs (cost of VA health care, non-VA services and other specified social costs), efficacy measures (PANNS, BPRS, CGI Severity, and neurocognitive battery scores) and safety measures (adverse events, ECG?s). Study Abstract: Although currently marketed antipsychotic drugs are useful in the treatment of schizophrenia, efficacy and safety profiles need to be improved. Forty to eighty percent of patients either fail to respond or only partially respond to conventional antipsychotic agents. Secondary symptoms may be unimproved even in patients who respond to treatment. A variety of adverse events occur in patients receiving currently available agents. The severity of these events contributes to the poor compliance that is observed in this patient population. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Other side effects are minimal. Approximately 327 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group was prescribed olanzapine with daily dosage ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. The other treatment group was prescribed haloperidol with daily dosage also ranging from 5 mg/day to 20 mg/day. A semi-structured psychosocial case management treatment program is provided for all study patients. Patients were recruited from 18 VA medical centers over a 24-month period and were followed for one year. 18 patients were enrolled at one site that had its research program terminated during the study. Because of questions regarding the circumstances that led to the termination, these 18 patients will not be included in study analyses. The major objective of the study is to determine if olanzapine is more cost effective than haloperidol. Secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety, social and vocational functioning, family burden, compliance and satisfaction for olanzapine relative to haloperidol. MANUSCRIPT: Primary manuscript published in JAMA, November 2003.

Interventions

  • Drug: Haloperidol
  • Drug: Olanzapine

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Experimental: 1
    • Olanzapine
  • Active Comparator: 2
    • Haloperidol

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Exclusion Criteria:

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: N/A

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • US Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Collaborator
    • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Rosenheck, Robert – Study Chair, Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Overall Official(s)
    • Robert A. Rosenheck, AB MD, Study Chair, VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)

Citations Reporting on Results

Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Kaczynski R, Bingham S, Collins J. Association of symptomatology and cognitive deficits to functional capacity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb;99(1-3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Sep 12.

Rosenheck R, Perlick D, Bingham S, Liu-Mares W, Collins J, Warren S, Leslie D, Allan E, Campbell EC, Caroff S, Corwin J, Davis L, Douyon R, Dunn L, Evans D, Frecska E, Grabowski J, Graeber D, Herz L, Kwon K, Lawson W, Mena F, Sheikh J, Smelson D, Smith-Gamble V; Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on the Cost-Effectiveness of Olanzapine. Effectiveness and cost of olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Nov 26;290(20):2693-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.20.2693.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.