Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Spectroscopy Techniques

Overview

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are diagnostic tests that allow researchers to look at different chemical properties of tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy studies can be used to gather or evaluate information about various aspects of patient s bodies or to monitor changes in the biochemistry and physiology of patient s bodies. Unlike other diagnostic techniques (CT scan and PET scan) MRI and MRS do not use ionizing radiation. Some studies have shown that MRI is more effective at distinguishing normal parts of the anatomy from abnormal anatomy, especially in the brain. MRI has become the diagnostic test of choice for evaluating patient with multiple sclerosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate normal volunteers and patients with a variety of diseases with magnetic resonance imaging. Researchers will attempt different magnetic resonance imaging methods and techniques as well as different levels of magnetic strength.

Full Title of Study: “Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla”

Study Type

  • Study Type: Observational
  • Study Design
    • Time Perspective: Prospective
  • Study Primary Completion Date: June 3, 2020

Detailed Description

Background: MRI is a constantly evolving imaging modality. Pulse sequences are often modified to improve their performance. However, many of these changes have not yet been approved by the FDA and therefore, are not considered standard of care. Some of these sequences require the use of new types of imaging coils, which are also investigational. Objectives: The major purpose of this protocol is to inform patients undergoing MR scans in the Clinical Center that they be scanned with MRI sequences and/or coils which may or may not be FDA approved and to get the patient s consent for this. This is not a formal research study since specific disease entities and specific pulse sequences are not studied in a systematic way. Rather, the purpose is to give NIH patients access to gradual improvements in MR technology that would otherwise not be available to them. Eligibility: All patients who, by virtue of the NIH protocol in which they are enrolled, qualify for MRI will be eligible for participation in this protocol. Design: Up to 99,999 participants will be enrolled in this study.

Arms, Groups and Cohorts

  • Patients undergoing MRI in the Clinical Center
    • All patients who, by virtue of the NIH protocol in which they are enrolled, who qualify for MRI will be eligible for participation in this protocol.

Clinical Trial Outcome Measures

Primary Measures

  • Success of new sequences
    • Time Frame: 10 scan comparison
    • clinically meaningful pulse sequence improvements

Participating in This Clinical Trial

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients undergoing MRI in the Clinical Center. – Patients must be able to provide informed consents. EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Contraindications to MRI. – Inability to understand consent form or consent process and the absence of a suitable guardian. – Adults who are or may not be able to consent – Patients in whom the scan must be performed quickly, i.e. those patients under anesthesia, anxious patients, those requiring emergency medical care, or others in which it is deemed inappropriate to prolong a study. – Refusal to Participate. – Pregnant women and fetuses – Neonates

Gender Eligibility: All

Minimum Age: N/A

Maximum Age: 99 Years

Are Healthy Volunteers Accepted: No

Investigator Details

  • Lead Sponsor
    • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
  • Provider of Information About this Clinical Study
    • Sponsor
  • Overall Official(s)
    • John A Butman, M.D., Principal Investigator, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

References

Frank JA, Dwyer AJ, Doppman JL. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Important Adv Oncol. 1987:133-74.

Roschmann P, Tischler R. Surface coil proton MR imaging at 2 T. Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):251-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.1.3763875.

Kim EE, Pjura G, Lowry P, Verani R, Sandler C, Flechner S, Kahan B. Cyclosporin-A nephrotoxicity and acute cellular rejection in renal transplant recipients: correlation between radionuclide and histologic findings. Radiology. 1986 May;159(2):443-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.2.3515421.

Clinical trials entries are delivered from the US National Institutes of Health and are not reviewed separately by this site. Please see the identifier information above for retrieving further details from the government database.

At TrialBulletin.com, we keep tabs on over 200,000 clinical trials in the US and abroad, using medical data supplied directly by the US National Institutes of Health. Please see the About and Contact page for details.